Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoC] about removing productregistration.uno.component

2011-07-04 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Matus, On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 16:29 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote: > >The patches look lovely to me. Did we kill the OEM mess too ? > > I didn't send those, so here they are. > But you must first apply the one about socomp and then preload > cleaning. Hope it will be apply-able. Love

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoC] about removing productregistration.uno.component

2011-07-04 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Matus, On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 19:23 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote: > Well, it turned out re-applying was not necessary in the end. Just to > remove unused files. I've git push-ed that. The patches look lovely to me. Did we kill the OEM mess too ? Thanks :-) Michael.

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoC] about removing productregistration.uno.component

2011-07-03 Thread Matúš Kukan
Hi, On 3 July 2011 23:00, Andras Timar wrote: > Hi, > > 2011.07.02. 19:23 keltezéssel, Matúš Kukan írta: >> Hi, >> >> On 1 July 2011 15:19, Michael Meeks wrote: >>> Hi Matus, >>> >>> On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 13:53 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote: - It is probably somehow related to published service

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoC] about removing productregistration.uno.component

2011-07-03 Thread Andras Timar
Hi, 2011.07.02. 19:23 keltezéssel, Matúš Kukan írta: > Hi, > > On 1 July 2011 15:19, Michael Meeks wrote: >> Hi Matus, >> >> On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 13:53 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote: >>> - It is probably somehow related to published service >>> ProductRegistration.idl in offapi. >> >>Well -

Re: [Libreoffice] [GSoC] about removing productregistration.uno.component

2011-07-01 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Matus, On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 13:53 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote: > - It is probably somehow related to published service > ProductRegistration.idl in offapi. Well - we'd have to leave the IDL interface - and add it as a thing to remove in the wiki page: http://wiki.documentfoundat