Hi
I am quite happy for us for produce Java7 bytecode, if producing Java7
bytecode will actually make something work better.
But so far I have seen no signs of that.
And I'm speaking here, not as "some random hacker", but as a person with
10+ years experience of writing 1Mloc+ Java applicatio
n-Java-JDK-build-environments-impacting-JRE-use-tp4062592p4062806.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Stuart
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Question-on-Java-JDK-build-environments-impacting-JRE-use-tp4062592p4062800.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.fr
On 2013-06-23 19:25, V Stuart Foote wrote:
Issue of bytecode target interaction with JRE becomes more troubling if you
consider that the default Java JRE update settings on Windows systems
replace all JRE 6 installations with current JRE 7 builds. In other words
the percentage of total LibreOff
On 2013-06-23 17:24, V Stuart Foote wrote:
Thanks! The zip'd packaging is fine for testing, have grabbed a copy.
Will run with it and a JRE 1.7u25 and JAB 2.0.3, but noticed for starters
that the build target for the Java bytecode is still set to major/minor
49.0, or J2SE 5. Is that a javac co
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 08:10:42PM +0200, David Ostrovsky wrote:
> On Sun Jun 23 08:24:32 PDT 2013 Stuart Foote wrote:
>> Will run with it and a JRE 1.7u25 and JAB 2.0.3, but noticed for
>> starters that the build target for the Java bytecode is still set
>> to major/minor 49.0, or J2SE 5. Is tha
Le 22/06/2013 18:45, V Stuart Foote a écrit :
Hi Stuart,
Could anyone spin up a TB to build Windows (possibly OSX) master using JDK
7, or possibly even Open JDK 8 beta (which has been marked M7 Feature
Complete as of 2013/06/13 ) and build Libreoffice with J2SE 7 classes?
And, if not too comp
ds
the percentage of total LibreOffice ussers with JRE 1.5 or JRE 1.6
installations even installed is rapidly shrinking.
Stuart
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Question-on-Java-JDK-build-environments-impacting-JRE-use-tp4062592p4062733.html
Sent from the D
On Sun Jun 23 08:24:32 PDT 2013 Stuart Foote wrote:
>Will run with it and a JRE 1.7u25 and JAB 2.0.3, but noticed for
>starters
>that the build target for the Java bytecode is still set to major/minor
>49.0, or J2SE 5. Is that a javac compatibility mode setting of some sort?
Yes, it is, i tried
n.org/Question-on-Java-JDK-build-environments-impacting-JRE-use-tp4062592p4062715.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
On Sat Jun 22 Stuart Foote wrote:
[...]
>Could anyone spin up a TB to build Windows (possibly OSX) master using
>JDK 7
[...]
>Any takers?
just uploaded a very recent LO debug build (from the last Hackathon,
June 16) with that endless loop fix applied [1]:
http://ostrovsky.org/libo/LibreOfficeDev
cumentfoundation.org/Question-on-Java-JDK-build-environments-impacting-JRE-use-tp4062592.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
12 matches
Mail list logo
