Hi Mike,
Kaganski Mike wrote:
> On 21.04.2019 0:22, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> > Hmm - so the uitests are rigging the office in a very specific way,
> > using subprocess.Popen to spawn a child soffice process from python
> > (which calls CreateProcess on Windows). Code for that is in
> > uitest/lib
On 21.04.2019 0:22, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
>> 1. First of all - do I understand it correctly that the problem is real
>> - so there are possible scenarios involving e.g. python (or another
>> process which executable is not in LO's instdir/program), that might
>> need gpgme?
>>
> See above - but e
Hi Thorsten,
Thanks for your analysis!
On 21.04.2019 0:22, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Kaganski Mike wrote:
>> However, I suppose that it's possible in theory that some user python
>> script could ultimately need initializing gpgme. In that case, the
>> problem would hit the user. Having a modal di
Hi Mike,
Kaganski Mike wrote:
> However, I suppose that it's possible in theory that some user python
> script could ultimately need initializing gpgme. In that case, the
> problem would hit the user. Having a modal dialog waiting on a possibly
> headless server is not a correct behavior :-)
>
Hi Thorsten, *,
When working on a 6-0-based branch on Windows, in make check, two python
tests emit modal error dialogs about missing gpgme-w32spawn.exe:
> ---
> GpgME not installed correctly
> ---
> gpgme-w32spawn.exe was not found in the detected
