Re: Playing ping pong with ODF version; does it pose a danger to the end user.

On 22/04/2021 19:12, Thorsten Behrens wrote: Huh. So there's no good, universal advise I'm willing to give, except that you'll probably get nasty surprises with_any_ kind of complex office documents (regardless of the format being odf, ooxml, rtf or what else), if you read & write them across a

Re: Playing ping pong with ODF version; does it pose a danger to the end user.

Thanks for the feedback Regina & Thorsten. Well, given the information in the replies and what I've seen anecdotally I feel prepared to field questions if they come up. BTW I added OnlyOffice into the mix last night. It behaves pretty much as MSO 365 when handling these 1.3 files. Best wishes,

Re: Playing ping pong with ODF version; does it pose a danger to the end user.

Hi Drew, Drew Jensen schrieb am 22.04.2021 um 18:59: Howdy, Recently I exchanged a few documents between a number of ODF editors: LO 7.1 (all documents were created here with default settings) Google Docs Microsoft Office 365 Apache OpenOffice In the case of all Google and MSO the files open u

Re: Playing ping pong with ODF version; does it pose a danger to the end user.

Hi Drew, Drew Jensen wrote: > In the case of all Google and MSO the files open up without any kind > of warning about the ODF version being 1.3. > Ah cool, that's good to hear, thx for checking (MSO used to infamously complain about odf1.2 when that was new)! > So, I was wondering if this is a po

Playing ping pong with ODF version; does it pose a danger to the end user.

Howdy, Recently I exchanged a few documents between a number of ODF editors: LO 7.1 (all documents were created here with default settings) Google Docs Microsoft Office 365 Apache OpenOffice In the case of all Google and MSO the files open up without any kind of warning about the ODF version bein