> Well - I'm sorry you feel that way; you're of course welcome to
> discuss
> things inside the project, but please use the discuss list for
> everything not directly related to a code contribution you're working
> on :-) Hopefully it's not such a bad thing to have different purposes
>
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 19:41 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Meanwhile, given the tone in the list, where even asking a few
> questions is considered as disturbance
;-) not all questions are created equal; "have you stopped beating your
wife", "how come you are so handsome ?" etc. some have
> It seems to me, that you contribute a lot of opinionated email,
> and thus far no useful code.
Well, my code base isn't ready for submission yet - I didn't really
have a chance to test it, because:
a) builds take so long (somewhere in scale of an hour)
b) latest master doesnt even compile - f
Hi Enrico,
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 18:43 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > The point is, they are not relevant for LibreOffice's goals. In
> > fact, since you're distracting other contributors from LibreOffice
> > goals, they are in practice against LibreOffice goals, so it may
> > happen that ignori
> The point is, they are not relevant for LibreOffice's goals. In
> fact, since you're distracting other contributors from LibreOffice
> goals, they are in practice against LibreOffice goals, so it may
> happen that ignoring you will be achieved by technical means,
Ah, you wanna ban me from the
> Sorry for being tardy to the party here, but one thing that wasnt
> mentioned was OpenPGP. Could that be considered as an alternative?
> From what im seeing in the Ubuntu world, they are using it to sign
> packages, could that be used as an alternative to OpenSSL?
ACK. And, btw, xmlsec also has
Sorry for being tardy to the party here, but one thing that wasnt mentioned was
OpenPGP. Could that be considered as an alternative? From what im seeing in the
Ubuntu world, they are using it to sign packages, could that be used as an
alternative to OpenSSL?
Regards
Jonathan Aquilina
On May 4,
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 17:40 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
> AFAIK it only accesses a Mozilla profile if you want to sign documents,
> to find user's certificates (LO doesn't have an UI for adding or storing
> these, it can only select existing ones from the Mozilla profile)
FWIW I added a gui for se
On 04/05/12 13:42, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 12:09:15PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
>> of course replacing OpenSSL dependencies with GnuTLS doesn't help in
>> that regard, it only helps with the licensing issues you have.
>>
>> seems the Fedora project is standardizing on NSS
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 09:40 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Yes very much so ! I'd love to rip openssl completely out of our
> packages if possible, it's just silly to have redundant, duplicate
> security critical libraries :-)
Yeah, it'd be great. We need nss for digital signatures anyway via
> > This statement was on Fedora's global consolidation project.
> > Please always keep the context.
>
> And why this is being discussed here in *LibreOffice* mailing list?
> :)
Because Michael brought it into discussion.
By the way, those global objectives/tedencies might be valid arguments,
as
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 03:57:49PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 03:16:59PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > > Otherwise it's practical use is limited to pure desktop-only
> > > environments.
> >
> > Of course, given that LibreOffice is not a desktop application, oh
>
> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 03:16:59PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > Otherwise it's practical use is limited to pure desktop-only
> > environments.
>
> Of course, given that LibreOffice is not a desktop application, oh
> wait...
This statement was on Fedora's global consolidation project.
Pleas
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 03:16:59PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Otherwise it's practical use is limited to pure desktop-only environments.
Of course, given that LibreOffice is not a desktop application, oh
wait...
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffi
> i don't really get the point of supporting 2 different crypto
> libraries
> (given that we don't really offer anything in terms of re-usable
> libraries ourselves here, we just ship an application that needs
> crypto
> stuff done); it just seems to add additional complexity, and bloat to
> the i
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 12:09:15PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
> of course replacing OpenSSL dependencies with GnuTLS doesn't help in
> that regard, it only helps with the licensing issues you have.
>
> seems the Fedora project is standardizing on NSS for crypto applications:
>
> http://fedorapro
On 04/05/12 02:30, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Due to a license conflict with a project I was working on, I had the
> task of building LibreOffice without OpenSSL support.
hi Patrick,
yes imho the OpenSSL license is annoying (perhaps the only still widely
used library with that obnoxious
Hi,
> Due to a license conflict with a project I was working on, I had the
> task of building LibreOffice without OpenSSL support.
which kind of conflict exactly ?
> I realize that a more appropriate solution would be to conditionally
> compile the two code paths using WITH_OPENSSL and WITH_NS
Hi Patrick,
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 17:30 -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> Due to a license conflict with a project I was working on, I had the
> task of building LibreOffice without OpenSSL support.
Wow - cool :-)
> Is there any interest in adding this type of multiple/fallback SSL
> libra
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Patrick McCarty
> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Due to a license conflict with a project I was working on, I had the
>> task of building LibreOffice without OpenSSL support.
>>
>> To accomplish this, I replaced th
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Patrick McCarty
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Due to a license conflict with a project I was working on, I had the
> task of building LibreOffice without OpenSSL support.
>
> To accomplish this, I replaced the relevant code from the OOX module
> that uses the OpenSSL API (fro
Hello,
Due to a license conflict with a project I was working on, I had the
task of building LibreOffice without OpenSSL support.
To accomplish this, I replaced the relevant code from the OOX module
that uses the OpenSSL API (from oox/source/core/filterdetect.cxx) to use
the NSS API instead, and
22 matches
Mail list logo
