Luboš, Eike,
Op 21-06-2022 om 15:12 schreef Winfried Donkers:
Am I correct when stating that ScLookupCache currently cannot cope
with the
combinations
eOp SC_GREATER_EQUAL and sorted in ascending order
and
eOp SC_LESSER_EQUAL and sorted in descending order?
As Luboš already said, ScLookup
Am I correct when stating that ScLookupCache currently cannot cope with the
combinations
eOp SC_GREATER_EQUAL and sorted in ascending order
and
eOp SC_LESSER_EQUAL and sorted in descending order?
As Luboš already said, ScLookupCache just caches results of lookups, to
be able to reuse them fo
Hi Winfried,
On Thursday, 2022-06-16 11:58:54 +0200, Winfried Donkers wrote:
> Am I correct when stating that ScLookupCache currently cannot cope with the
> combinations
> eOp SC_GREATER_EQUAL and sorted in ascending order
> and
> eOp SC_LESSER_EQUAL and sorted in descending order?
As Luboš al
Hi Luboš,
Am I correct when stating that ScLookupCache currently cannot cope with
the combinations
eOp SC_GREATER_EQUAL and sorted in ascending order
and
eOp SC_LESSER_EQUAL and sorted in descending order?
No, it's not correct, why would you think that would be the case? As the name
sa
On Thursday 16 of June 2022, Winfried Donkers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am implementing Excel function XLOOKUP in Calc (at a slow pace), and
> need some help with ScLookupCache.
>
> Am I correct when stating that ScLookupCache currently cannot cope with
> the combinations
> eOp SC_GREATER_EQUAL and sort
Hi,
I am implementing Excel function XLOOKUP in Calc (at a slow pace), and
need some help with ScLookupCache.
Am I correct when stating that ScLookupCache currently cannot cope with
the combinations
eOp SC_GREATER_EQUAL and sorted in ascending order
and
eOp SC_LESSER_EQUAL and sorted in de
