Re: Need for new x86 Jenkin's Bot

2019-06-05 Thread Luke Benes
Christian, Our concern is that by scuttling @87, we will lose important diversity in TDF's testing infrastructure. While upgrading @87 does address this, it is not what we are asking for. Why have you chosen to not upgrade @87 like you have the others? Master will build on x86 Fedora 30, Cent

Re: Need for new x86 Jenkin's Bot

2019-06-05 Thread Christian Lohmaier
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 5:01 PM Luke Benes wrote: > > The decision was to demote release builds, but NOT to remove x86 > compatibility. If you take this as an excuse to also end x86 CI testing bots, > you are effectively killing x86 through bit rot. That is completely missing the point. The tind

Re: Need for new x86 Jenkin's Bot

2019-06-05 Thread Michael Stahl
On 04.06.19 19:23, Jan-Marek Glogowski wrote: Hi everyone, Am 04.06.19 um 17:01 schrieb Luke Benes: The decision was to demote release builds, but NOT to remove x86 compatibility. If you take this as an excuse to also end x86 CI testing bots, you are effectively killing x86 through bit rot. Thi

Re: Need for new x86 Jenkin's Bot

2019-06-04 Thread Jan-Marek Glogowski
Hi everyone, Am 04.06.19 um 17:01 schrieb Luke Benes: > The decision was to demote release builds, but NOT to remove x86 > compatibility. If you take this as an excuse to also end x86 CI testing bots, > you are effectively killing x86 through bit rot. This is not a hypothetical. > As you know, @87

Need for new x86 Jenkin's Bot

2019-06-04 Thread Luke Benes
Christian, The decision was to demote release builds, but NOT to remove x86 compatibility. If you take this as an excuse to also end x86 CI testing bots, you are effectively killing x86 through bit rot. This is not a hypothetical. As you know, @87 just recently caught a regression introduced b