NEEDINFO Bugs

Hi All, I've done the first round of "warnings" to NEEDINFO bugs that are stagnant. You may receive a group of emails about this, within the last 2 minutes I've done 140 or so. The link for these bugs can be found here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?list_

Closing Old NEEDINFO Bugs

Hi All, Just a heads up that QA will be moving forward this week with closing bugs that have been dead for >6 months. After long deliberation and many conversations during calls and through email, we think that overall this will be a very positive thing for the project. I will be doing the first

QA Mission Statement (was: Re: Fwd: Re: Closing NEEDINFO bugs)

Hi, On 20. Aug 2012 00:56, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > [...] > The first goal of the QA team is [...] nice statement :-) I had the impulse to put it in a prominent place on the QA Homepage[1]. Feel free to complete it or improve wording. Nino [1] http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Closing NEEDINFO bugs

Hi Flo, all, On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 07:53:35PM +0300, Florian Reisinger wrote: > In fact, it was a good choice... (I hope you can read this table...) While the statistic alone do not really prove this to be good move, but there was a consensus on the qa call(*) and the qa list that this needs to

Closing NEEDINFO bugs

Hi! About one week ago, I did a mass change, here is pre-final statistic (by bugzilla): In fact, it was a good choice... (I hope you can read this table...) * *UNCONFIRMED1