Re: Java situation

2013-02-06 Thread Michael Meeks
On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 05:04 -0800, julien2412 wrote: > - Must we still advise to install jre 6 when there are problems with jre7? IMHO for accessibility - certainly; there seems to be little appetite to investigate / debug those issues with 1.7 either on the openJDK side or in LibreOffice

Re: Java situation

2013-02-05 Thread julien2412
tephan Bergmann-2 wrote > On Mac OS X and Windows, where LO is currently only available as a 32 > bit application, it can only make use of a JRE that includes a 32 bit JVM. Thank you, I'll definitely put this on my notes :-) Julien -- View this message in context: http://n

Re: Java situation

2013-02-05 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 02/05/2013 02:04 PM, julien2412 wrote: So to help QA triage/advising, it could be interesting to know the current situation: - Must we still advise to install jre 6 when there are problems with jre7? I at least am not aware of any such problems that would go away when downgrading from JRE 7

Re: Java situation

2013-02-05 Thread julien2412
t: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Java-situation-tp4034553p4034619.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Java situation

2013-02-05 Thread julien2412
the same (except license consideration) - is there a list somewhere of components which use Java? - is there a kind of migration planning or just priorities? Julien -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Java-situation-tp4034553.html Sent from the Dev mailing l