Am 07.10.2015 um 16:17 schrieb Jan-Marek Glogowski:
> Hi Markus
>
> Does this also handle the inverse case, if the CPPUNIT_TEST_FAIL
> actually passes, i.e. throws no exception?
So I tested this myself. Guess I can abandon the patchset.
Jan-Marek
___
L
Hi Markus
Am 07.10.2015 um 14:21 schrieb Markus Mohrhard:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Jan-Marek Glogowski
> wrote:
>
> Please keep in mind that this is possible with the current cppunit already.
> The only difference (I'm not sure if that is really a useful feature) is
> that your patch se
On 10/07/2015 02:11 PM, Jan-Marek Glogowski wrote:
Am 07.10.2015 um 12:47 schrieb Stephan Bergmann:
On 10/07/2015 11:37 AM, Jan-Marek Glogowski wrote:
I've implemented CPPUNIT_TEST_XFAIL to add test cases to a suite, which
are expected to fail.
Do you have some explanation what this is good f
Hey,
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Jan-Marek Glogowski
wrote:
> Am 07.10.2015 um 12:47 schrieb Stephan Bergmann:
> > On 10/07/2015 11:37 AM, Jan-Marek Glogowski wrote:
> >> I've implemented CPPUNIT_TEST_XFAIL to add test cases to a suite, which
> >> are expected to fail.
> >
> > Do you have so
Am 07.10.2015 um 12:47 schrieb Stephan Bergmann:
> On 10/07/2015 11:37 AM, Jan-Marek Glogowski wrote:
>> I've implemented CPPUNIT_TEST_XFAIL to add test cases to a suite, which
>> are expected to fail.
>
> Do you have some explanation what this is good for? (My assumption is
> that one would just
On 10/07/2015 11:37 AM, Jan-Marek Glogowski wrote:
I've implemented CPPUNIT_TEST_XFAIL to add test cases to a suite, which
are expected to fail.
Do you have some explanation what this is good for? (My assumption is
that one would just write the test code in a way that it is supposed to
succe
Hi.
I've implemented CPPUNIT_TEST_XFAIL to add test cases to a suite, which
are expected to fail. See
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/19213/
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/19214/
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/19215/
The current approach unfortunately breaks the ABI and API. The API b
