On 16/04/2014 18:29, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 12:26 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 04:41 -0700, julien2412 wrote:
Even if changelog indicates only micro optim, perhaps it could be
interesting to give it a try.
Could you point me to HarfBuzz's change log? I
On 2014-04-16 05:02, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
This bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75665
reveals that our HarfBuzz based text rendering is quite expensive. I
tried to do what I could on the Calc side to lessen the impact of this
problem. I've made some improvement, but I've hit m
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 12:26 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 04:41 -0700, julien2412 wrote:
> > Even if changelog indicates only micro optim, perhaps it could be
> > interesting to give it a try.
>
> Could you point me to HarfBuzz's change log? I have hard time finding
> it.
N
On Wed, 2014-04-16 at 04:41 -0700, julien2412 wrote:
> Even if changelog indicates only micro optim, perhaps it could be
> interesting to give it a try.
Could you point me to HarfBuzz's change log? I have hard time finding
it.
Kohei
___
LibreOffice ma
work, at least, investigation in
harfbuzz would start from the most recent version.
Julien
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/HarfBuzz-performance-problem-tp4105389p4105434.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabbl
Hi there,
This bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75665
reveals that our HarfBuzz based text rendering is quite expensive. I
tried to do what I could on the Calc side to lessen the impact of this
problem. I've made some improvement, but I've hit my roadblock.
I was wondering if
