> doesnt hide the old and rusty ones (as Noel suggested), but shows _only_
> the
> old and rusty ones. Sooo, if your patch is on there, please abandon or
> update
> it. (Reducing the age to 2 weeks, with is pretty old already, is left as an
> excerise to the reader).
>
Is there a way if lets say a
Hi,
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 03:10:13PM +0200, Fridrich Strba wrote:
> As for me, this was more a reminder for authors to do their cleaning up
> which is preferable to me doing it manu militari.
Right, it makes no sense to have those changes in gerrit and let them rot. As
such
> >
> > https://
As for me, this was more a reminder for authors to do their cleaning up
which is preferable to me doing it manu militari.
f.
On 23/05/13 14:50, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 02:32:50PM +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
>> Maybe what you need is a new feature in Gerrit which doesn't
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 02:32:50PM +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
> Maybe what you need is a new feature in Gerrit which doesn't display
> patches to you that have received negative review and have no
> further work?
No new feature needed, e.g.:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/q/project:core+age:1
On 2013-05-23 13:02, Fridrich Strba wrote:
However, if you have a submission in Gerrit that is having negative
review and you are not planning to work on that patch or that patch is
obsolete, please consider abandoning it in Gerrit, since now there are
~3/4 of patches in this state. That will als
Dear developers and other contributors to our wonderful Office Suite.
I love you all and I love the work you are doing.
However, if you have a submission in Gerrit that is having negative
review and you are not planning to work on that patch or that patch is
obsolete, please consider abandoning i
