On 11/28/2016 04:30 PM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 09:35:59AM -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
Does anyone has considered the glaringly obvious privacy issue of
such scheme ?
People trade privacy for convenience or the other way round all the
time. People that in this case
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 09:35:59AM -0600, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>> The shell script would be something like:
>>> unzip -d oldFirebird.odb temp;
>>> gbak -b temp/database/firebird.fdb temp/database/firebird.fbk;
>> insert here:
>> r
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>
>> The shell script would be something like:
>
>> unzip -d oldFirebird.odb temp;
>> gbak -b temp/database/firebird.fdb temp/database/firebird.fbk;
> insert here:
> rm temp/database/firebird.fdb
>> zip -FSr oldFirebird.odb temp;
>> rm -r
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 04:20:06PM +0100, Bunth Tamás wrote:
> To use the Firebird driver as the default sdbc driver for Base there
> is still a missing feature considered as a blocker. The new built-in
> FB3 dbms cannot open old FB2 databases.
> Now (since the summer), inside the .odb file there
Hi,
To use the Firebird driver as the default sdbc driver for Base there
is still a missing feature considered as a blocker. The new built-in
FB3 dbms cannot open old FB2 databases.
Now (since the summer), inside the .odb file there is a FB archive
file stored instead of the .fdb file.
So the ta
