Re: Failure to build 3.6 branch

2013-01-11 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 11/01/13 14:57, Alexander Thurgood a écrit : > >> I'd rather guess simply a bug in the compiler (since it's on Mac, it's the >> old gcc-4.0.1, right?). Try if the file compiles successfully with 'make >> DEBUG=1', that will disable optimizations. >> No joy, still fails at exactly the same

Re: Failure to build 3.6 branch

2013-01-11 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 10/01/13 19:06, Lubos Lunak a écrit : Hi Lubos, > I'd rather guess simply a bug in the compiler (since it's on Mac, it's the > old gcc-4.0.1, right?). Try if the file compiles successfully with 'make > DEBUG=1', that will disable optimizations. > No, it is actually gcc 4.2.1, but I'll tr

Re: Failure to build 3.6 branch

2013-01-10 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Thursday 10 of January 2013, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > Le 10/01/13 12:24, Caolán McNamara a écrit : > > I wonder if that file has grown too big for your toolchain. Try > > splitting up the file into two and see if you can get it to compile that > > way. > > Unfortunately, you have lost me ther

Re: Failure to build 3.6 branch

2013-01-10 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 10/01/13 12:24, Caolán McNamara a écrit : > I wonder if that file has grown too big for your toolchain. Try > splitting up the file into two and see if you can get it to compile that > way. > Unfortunately, you have lost me there. I wouldn't know how to do that. I'm only trying to build at al

Re: Failure to build 3.6 branch

2013-01-10 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Thursday 10 of January 2013, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > Le 10/01/13 12:24, Caolán McNamara a écrit : > > Hi Caolán, > > > I wonder if that file has grown too big for your toolchain. Try > > splitting up the file into two and see if you can get it to compile that > > way. > > Hmm, if I try and b

Re: Failure to build 3.6 branch

2013-01-10 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 10/01/13 12:24, Caolán McNamara a écrit : Hi Caolán, > > I wonder if that file has grown too big for your toolchain. Try > splitting up the file into two and see if you can get it to compile that > way. Hmm, if I try and build just unotools, I get the following error when building unotools_in

Re: Failure to build 3.6 branch

2013-01-10 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 11:38 +0100, Alexander Thurgood wrote: > /Users/Shared/Repos/LO/core/unotools/source/misc/fontcvt.cxx:1535: > internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11 > Please submit a full bug report, I wonder if that file has grown too big for your toolchain. Try splitting up the fi

Re: Failure to build 3.6 branch

2013-01-10 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 09/01/13 23:19, Lubos Lunak a écrit : Ooops, forgot to mention that I'm building from master, sorry. Alex ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

Re: Failure to build 3.6 branch

2013-01-10 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 09/01/13 23:19, Lubos Lunak a écrit : Hi Lubos, > Should be fixed now. > This still fails for me on Mac today with a fresh pull and complete clean. First few lines of error message below : /Users/Shared/Repos/LO/core/unotools/source/misc/fontcvt.cxx:1535: internal compiler error: Segmentat

Re: Failure to build 3.6 branch

2013-01-09 Thread Lubos Lunak
On Wednesday 09 of January 2013, Ruslan Kabatsayev wrote: > Hi all, > > I was trying to build latest libreoffice-3-6 branch, and got > compilation failure. Here's output: > > _ > [ build CXX ] unotools/source/streaming/streamwrap.cxx > /fastdocs/p

Re: Failure to build 3.6 branch

2013-01-09 Thread Alex Thurgood
Le 09/01/2013 19:46, Ruslan Kabatsayev a écrit : Hi Ruslan, > I was trying to build latest libreoffice-3-6 branch, and got > compilation failure. Here's output: > > _ > [ build CXX ] unotools/source/streaming/streamwrap.cxx > /fastdocs/programm