Hi John,
On Tuesday, 2013-08-06 22:49:43 +1000, John Pye wrote:
> For the record, I also found this page:
> http://help.libreoffice.org/Calc/Add-in_for_Programming_in_Calc
>
> This seems to allude to a much simpler way of writing Calc add-ins,
> but it's not clear if this alternative API is real
For the record, I also found this page:
http://help.libreoffice.org/Calc/Add-in_for_Programming_in_Calc
This seems to allude to a much simpler way of writing Calc add-ins, but
it's not clear if this alternative API is really deprecated or not, nor
how it works on Linux (page refers only to 'DLL
On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 05:29:27PM +1000, John Pye wrote:
> Thanks for that. Do you know how often we would need to recompile
> extensions for Calc? Every major release, or every minor release, or
> less often?
Worst case, every major release (like 4.1 -> 4.2).
> Does it matter that the API chan
Hi Tor,
On 06/08/13 12:58, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
that means that we need to compile add-ins using the same C++
compiler as the UNO libraries were compiled with. What compiler is
that, in the case of binary releases of LO for Windows?
Visual Studio 2010. Using other Visual Studio
>
>
> that means that we need to compile add-ins using the same C++ compiler as
> the UNO libraries were compiled with. What compiler is that, in the case of
> binary releases of LO for Windows?
Visual Studio 2010. Using other Visual Studio versions (2008, 2012) might
work fine, too.
--tml
_
