Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-03-12 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 10/03/18 19:53, Luke Benes wrote: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/50978/ - can you try if that fixes your issue? Unfortunately, the build is still failing with this patch. Do you want anything from the logs? That matches my understanding (as expressed in the gerrit change), that, to

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-03-10 Thread Luke Benes
> https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/50978/ - can you try if that fixes your > issue? Unfortunately, the build is still failing with this patch. Do you want anything from the logs? To reproduce this yourself, you can copy your source tree to a folder as deep as mine. As I said earlier, by co

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-03-08 Thread t...@libreoffice.org
I wrote: > I'll mull over if we can somehow prevent that for this test... > https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/50978/ - can you try if that fixes your issue? Cheers, -- Thorsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ LibreOffice mailing lis

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-03-08 Thread t...@libreoffice.org
Hi Luke, this one indeed clears it up: Luke Benes wrote: > [pid 24144] write(2, "gpg: can't connect to the agent: File name too > long", 51) = 51 > This is quite unexpected. There's a thread about it on the upstream gpg list: https://lists.gt.net/gnupg/users/79522 I'll mull over if we can someh

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-03-08 Thread Michael Stahl
On 08.03.2018 04:59, Luke Benes wrote: > Sorry, copy/paste error. Here is the correct URL: > > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/slacka/412bea7ad1012cb60dac6af583712736/raw/3b8309b7a5dd568c35eb6758edbb15e771e290d2/strace2.txt > > [pid 24144] write(2, "gpg: can't connect to the agent: File name

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-03-07 Thread Luke Benes
Sorry, copy/paste error. Here is the correct URL: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/slacka/412bea7ad1012cb60dac6af583712736/raw/3b8309b7a5dd568c35eb6758edbb15e771e290d2/strace2.txt ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://l

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-03-07 Thread Luke Benes
Here is the updated strace log: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/slacka/412bea7ad1012cb60dac6af583712736/raw/3b8309b7a5dd568c35eb6758edbb15e771e290d2/strace2. Made with $ make CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing CPPUNITTRACE="strace -f -s 77" 2>&1 | tee trace.log Let me know if there's anything

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-03-07 Thread Michael Stahl
On 07.03.2018 01:10, Luke Benes wrote: > Here is the strace log: > > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/slacka/a07fac3b1ab0396df066968e2e216c8d/raw/6e1b1414b9db9da04a306a00dd27e1446f9e1377/strace.txt > > Let me know if there's anything else I can do to help. gpg fails with: [pid 19515] write(2,

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-03-06 Thread Luke Benes
Here is the strace log: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/slacka/a07fac3b1ab0396df066968e2e216c8d/raw/6e1b1414b9db9da04a306a00dd27e1446f9e1377/strace.txt Let me know if there's anything else I can do to help. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@li

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-03-06 Thread Luke Benes
One more clue as to what is going on. I copied the source tree from my external HD to my home folder and the rebuilt. This time the build succeeded without any errors. There something about the path on my system that's triggering this bug. ___ LibreOf

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-03-05 Thread Luke Benes
Here is the new backtrace: https://pastebin.com/uKsUJMUX $ cat autogen.input --enable-debug So I think optimizations are all disabled. Let me know if that helps. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedeskto

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-03-04 Thread t...@libreoffice.org
Luke Benes wrote: > Let me know if there is anything else I can do to help. > Hi Luke, terribly sorry, but the BTs still don't give any useful hint at what's going wrong. Are you building with optimisation? Since appopen.cxx:240 really contains no throwing (but the called function decryptGpgSessi

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-02-07 Thread Luke Benes
Subject: Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux   Luke Benes wrote: > This was on my 64-bit Ubuntu 17.10 box. Anything useful here? > Hi Luke, no, not really - could you please do the 'catch throw' part, too, from my earlier mail? And then si

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-02-04 Thread t...@libreoffice.org
Luke Benes wrote: > This was on my 64-bit Ubuntu 17.10 box. Anything useful here? > Hi Luke, no, not really - could you please do the 'catch throw' part, too, from my earlier mail? And then single-step inside appopen.cxx, until you hit an exception? Cheers, -- Thorsten signature.asc Descripti

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-02-03 Thread Luke Benes
Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux   Hi Luke, Luke Benes wrote: > This is not a 32/64 bit issue, as I'm seeing this on my 64 bit > Ubuntu 17.10 system. The full, unedited log built with > SAL_LOG="+WARN.+INFO.xmlsecurity+INFO.comphelper.crypto" > Hmm, nothing really he

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-02-01 Thread t...@libreoffice.org
Hi Luke, Luke Benes wrote: > This is not a 32/64 bit issue, as I'm seeing this on my 64 bit > Ubuntu 17.10 system. The full, unedited log built with > SAL_LOG="+WARN.+INFO.xmlsecurity+INFO.comphelper.crypto" > Hmm, nothing really helpful standing out there. If you please could: make CppunitTest_

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-01-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 05:14:35PM +0700, Andika Triwidada wrote: > > Anyways, for now I did add that patch to my disable-flaky-tests.diff > > (just the encrypt test) > > something like this? > > $ git diff > diff --git a/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/signing.cxx > b/xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/sig

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-01-29 Thread Andika Triwidada
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 8:16 PM, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 08:03:58PM +0700, Andika Triwidada wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 12:31 AM, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> > On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 06:20:04PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:03:06

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-01-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:03:06PM +, Luke Benes wrote: > The previous log was heavily trimmed to reduce size. While the OS is > different both builds share the same external drive. Could the path length be > a problem? (I trimmed the full path in the previous log) Or could this be > like t

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-01-28 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 08:03:58PM +0700, Andika Triwidada wrote: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 12:31 AM, Rene Engelhard wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 06:20:04PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:03:06PM +, Luke Benes wrote: > >> > The previous log was heavily

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-01-28 Thread Andika Triwidada
On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 12:31 AM, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 06:20:04PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:03:06PM +, Luke Benes wrote: >> > The previous log was heavily trimmed to reduce size. While the OS is >> > different both builds share the

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-01-27 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 06:20:04PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:03:06PM +, Luke Benes wrote: > > The previous log was heavily trimmed to reduce size. While the OS is > > different both builds share the same external drive. Could the path length > > be a problem?

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-01-22 Thread Luke Benes
This is not a 32/64 bit issue, as I'm seeing this on my 64 bit Ubuntu 17.10 system. The full, unedited log built with SAL_LOG="+WARN.+INFO.xmlsecurity+INFO.comphelper.crypto" Can be found here: https://pastebin.com/inwx0Hu0 The previous log was heavily trimmed to reduce size. While the OS i

CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-01-21 Thread Luke Benes
With both gcc and clang on Fedora 25, the build is failing with an assertion failure. This issue started with commit: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=8242c22f84cef1bbc8c385875b2da4713b542329 [CUT] xmlsecurity_signing SigningTest::testODFBrokenStreamGPG finished in: 639ms

Re: CppunitTest_xmlsecurity_signing Unit Test Failure on 32-bit Linux

2018-01-21 Thread thb
Luke Benes wrote: > /core/unotest/source/cpp/macros_test.cxx:52:SigningTest::testODFEncryptedGPG > assertion failed > - Expression: xComponent.is() > - loading failed: > file:///core//xmlsecurity/qa/unit/signing/data/encryptedGPG.odt > Hi Luke, this is weird - path is constructed exactly the sam