Hi y'all,
Italo Vignoli wrote:
> The so called marketing tribe at TDF has asked to change the
> numbering scheme to someting similar to Ubuntu several years ago,
> but the suggestion was completely ignored.
>
Not completely ignored, I'd say. There was the 2020/2025 MarCom plan
[1], plus the discus
The so called marketing tribe at TDF has asked to change the numbering
scheme to someting similar to Ubuntu several years ago, but the
suggestion was completely ignored. In the meantime you have lost another
opportunity of not insulting left and right people you do not know at
all (and apparent
We release on a biyearly calendar. We should use a scheme like
https://calver.org/ and not do arbitrary version number bumps based on
rationales no-one really understands outside the Marketing tribe at TDF
(because they’re secretive like that).
Can I just suggest that the problem is described here and then ignored.
Could you possibly consider changing the rate of change so that WHEN an
update happens it IS regarded as "HEY we did something cool" instead of
"HEY... we've moved things around to make it harder for you and introduced
a bunch
Hi!
I just came across another post mentioning the usual user's confusion
around LibreOffice versioning scheme [1], and I thought I share my thoughts.
When we have Major+Minor version numbers, minor changing every
half-a-year, and major changing at some random points, then every such
major n
