> Van: Eike Rathke [mailto:er...@redhat.com]
> Verzonden: donderdag 24 mei 2012 01:44
> > > >> From the Small Group, all but AVERAGIF are available.
I wil keep from AVERAGEIF (and fdo 41214), as communicated in the bug.
>From the Medium Group, at least ISOWEEKNUM seems to be missing in calc.
I'm s
Hi Winfried,
On Wednesday, 2012-05-23 13:14:56 +0200, Winfried Donkers wrote:
> > >> From the Small Group, all but AVERAGIF are available.
> >
> > It is (an other functions) in
> > http://hg.services.openoffice.org/cws/calcishmakkica/. But that CWS has not
> > been integrated to Apache OpenOffic
> >> From the Small Group, all but AVERAGIF are available.
>
> It is (an other functions) in
> http://hg.services.openoffice.org/cws/calcishmakkica/. But that CWS has not
> been integrated to Apache OpenOffice yet.
>
> If you will use it for LibreOffice, you should ask Apache to get it under
> A
Hi Winfried,
Winfried Donkers schrieb:
Just give us a heads-up what you
would like to pick so we can get into details. If possible we should
focus on functions defined in the Small/Medium/Large sets of ODFF in
that order, see
http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/cs01/OpenDocument-v1.2-cs01-
pa
> Just give us a heads-up what you
> would like to pick so we can get into details. If possible we should
> focus on functions defined in the Small/Medium/Large sets of ODFF in
> that order, see
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/office/v1.2/cs01/OpenDocument-v1.2-cs01-
> part2.html#__RefHeading__1018916
> > Also, coukld this page be a source for me to add more formulas that are in
> ODF1.2 and not yet in calc?
>
> Yes, it should be pretty up-to-date. Just give us a heads-up what you would
> like to pick so we can get into details. If possible we should focus on
> functions
> defined in the Small
On 22/05/12 11:02, Eike Rathke wrote:
> Hi Regina,
>
> On Tuesday, 2012-05-22 08:19:13 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
>
I don't see any LibreOffice comments, would this (DATEDIF) be the first
one?
>>>
>>> Yes, indeed, this would be an interesting precedence case.. it's
>>> probably bett
Hi Regina,
On Tuesday, 2012-05-22 08:19:13 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
> >>I don't see any LibreOffice comments, would this (DATEDIF) be the first one?
> >
> >Yes, indeed, this would be an interesting precedence case.. it's
> >probably better to setup our own page for this.
>
> I'm not sure ab
Hi,
Eike Rathke schrieb:
Hi,
On Wednesday, 2012-05-16 09:28:16 +0200, Winfried Donkers wrote:
Ehh.. I'm not familiar with adding content to (wiki/web) pages. And
anyway, Eike deserves at least as much credit for this patch.
I've no problem with being not explicitly mentioned, but add me if
Hi,
On Wednesday, 2012-05-16 09:28:16 +0200, Winfried Donkers wrote:
> Ehh.. I'm not familiar with adding content to (wiki/web) pages. And
> anyway, Eike deserves at least as much credit for this patch.
I've no problem with being not explicitly mentioned, but add me if you
think I deserve it ;-)
10 matches
Mail list logo
