I've taken the liberty of actually following the link at the bottom of every
list email, clicking on unsubscribe and putting your email address in they
subscribe box :-)
An unsubscribe confirmation email should be on its way.
Chris
Sent from my iPhone
> On 29 Dec 2014, at 11:35 am, Will Entri
Probably best to use the ML - this sounds like an odd issue worthy if
discussion.
If you post a new message with you findings, it might be best.
LO startup is something I'm interested in :-)
Chris
Sent from my iPhone
> On 29 Dec 2014, at 10:09 am, Jens Tröger wrote:
>
> I think this thread
UNSUBSCRIBE
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Jens Tröger
wrote:
> Thank you, Miklos,
>
> > > Using
> > >
> > > autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69
> > > automake (GNU automake) 1.14.1
> > >
> > > still gives that same error
> > >
> > > configure.ac:111: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_MSG_CHE
I think this thread is getting off-topic now. To discuss I have opened
a thread at the LO forum but without traction thus far:
http://en.libreofficeforum.org/node/9850
Cheers.
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 12:43:28PM +0100, Riccardo Magliocchetti wrote:
> Have you tried profiling? BTW if you use 4
Il 27/12/2014 20:49, Jens Tröger ha scritto:
It's the exact same document in both cases, and the conversion is
auto-piloted using Python and UNO. In fact, it's the exact same
scenario on both hosts:
- run LO headless,
- open Python interpreter and use UNO to connect to LO,
- iterate ov
Thank you, Miklos,
> > Using
> >
> > autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69
> > automake (GNU automake) 1.14.1
> >
> > still gives that same error
> >
> > configure.ac:111: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_MSG_CHECKING
> > If this token and others are legitimate, please use
> > m4_patt
It's the exact same document in both cases, and the conversion is
auto-piloted using Python and UNO. In fact, it's the exact same
scenario on both hosts:
- run LO headless,
- open Python interpreter and use UNO to connect to LO,
- iterate over all paragraphs.
Everything (LO, Python, ...) r
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 04:57:08PM +0100, Jens Tröger
wrote:
> I'm running on a server which has no X libraries installed. I noticed
> that running LO locally on my Mac for a document conversion takes about
> 5 seconds, on the server it took almost 3 minutes. My suspicion was
> that the X outpu
Hi Miklos,
> > The source tree is the official tar unpacked, fresh and virgin without
> > any modifications. Here's what happens:
> >
> > libreoffice-4.3.5.2 > ./autogen.sh --without-java --enable-headless
> > --with-theme=no
>
> Are you sure you need --enable-headless? If you want to do hea
Hi Jens,
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 03:21:42PM +0100, Jens Tröger
wrote:
> Here is my autoconf:
>
> libreoffice-4.3.5.2 > autoconf --version
> autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69
> Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Yes, that's fine.
> The source tree is the official tar unpacked,
Hi Jens,
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 05:56:17AM +0100, Jens Tröger
wrote:
> > Thank you for your answer; this email is in response to the thread here:
> >
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2014-October/064046.html
> >
> > I'm don't know how I can respond to the thread without
Hi Jens,
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 08:05:48PM +0200, Jens Tröger
wrote:
> This is with the default GNU autoconf 2.52. When I change line 158 in
> autogen.sh to use autoconf-2.69 I get this:
autoconf 2.69 is known to work.
> libreoffice > ./autogen.sh
> configure.ac:57: error: possibly undef
Hello,
I just enlisted in a fresh core source tree to build a local copy of LO.
However, autogen fails.
libreoffice > ./autogen.sh
autoconf: invalid option -I
Try `autoconf --help' for more information.
Failed to run autoconf at ./autogen.sh line 158.
This is with the default GNU autocon
13 matches
Mail list logo
