Re: Build with jemalloc

2013-09-01 Thread NOKUBI Takatsugu
Thanks for you reply. On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 12:20:04 +0200 Michael Stahl wrote: > although as far as i vaguely remember the really "bad" system memory > allocators are in Windows XP and earlier; the Vista and newer allocators > are said to be much better. It is a interesting things. I tried to wa

Re: Build with jemalloc

2013-08-31 Thread Michael Stahl
MS Office it is most likely not because of the memory allocator but because of sub-optimal data structures in the application cores (plus some constant overhead because LibreOffice is portable and thus needs more platform abstraction layers). > Then I tried to build with jemalloc, a famou

Build with jemalloc

2013-08-30 Thread NOKUBI Takatsugu
/hh448170.aspx I can find many malloc/free and new/delete pair, so I suspect possibility of heap memory fragmantation. Then I tried to build with jemalloc, a famous memory allocator. I modified desktop/Executable_soffice_bin.mk like the following: $(eval $(call gb_Executable_add_ldflags