Re: Branch 'feature/gbuild_testtools' - review request

2012-05-21 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 05/19/2012 11:44 AM, David Ostrovsky wrote: Then of course we have to preserve them! I just pushed another iteration. With new CustomTarget_bridgetest.mk all those batch file are generated now and run without error, magic ;-) Thanks. Works great, yes. I need a decision here: to merge it i

Re: Branch 'feature/gbuild_testtools' - review request

2012-05-19 Thread David Ostrovsky
Hi Stephan, thank you for review! On 18.05.2012 12:59, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 05/17/2012 11:43 PM, David Ostrovsky wrote: source/bridgetest/* is up and running now (except pyuno). The creation of some batch files is skipped, because they wasn't used anyway. Historically, testtools only c

Re: Branch 'feature/gbuild_testtools' - review request

2012-05-18 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 05/17/2012 11:43 PM, David Ostrovsky wrote: source/bridgetest/* is up and running now (except pyuno). The creation of some batch files is skipped, because they wasn't used anyway. Historically, testtools only created test scripts that were not executed during build. Later on, the most fund

Branch 'feature/gbuild_testtools' - review request

2012-05-17 Thread David Ostrovsky
Hi, could you please review the current state of this branch? source/bridgetest/* is up and running now (except pyuno). The creation of some batch files is skipped, because they wasn't used anyway. The single uno test is implemented in CustomTarget_uno_test.mk and marked with .PHONY to run eve