On 21/03/2021 10:46, Katarina Behrens wrote:
C'mon folks, this is not a controversial or complicated issue in any way
If it isn't controversial, why is it causing so much controversy?
Technical effort to make the change is minimal. Social or indeed human impact
of the change is net positive.
On Sunday 21 of March 2021, Katarina Behrens wrote:
> 'Let's wait for some random gits to come to their senses and only then
> follow the suit' is a bad take
A bad take is being the person to insult others while arguing for not
offending people in a discussion about not offending people.
--
L
cking with "master" regardless.
Original Message
Subject: Re: Alternative master/main branch proposal (Re: ANN: renaming
of master branch to "main" for core repository and submodules
(dictionaries, help, translations))
Date: 21.03.2021 06:46
From: Katarina Beh
C'mon folks, this is not a controversial or complicated issue in any way
Technical effort to make the change is minimal. Social or indeed human impact
of the change is net positive. That few folks who happen to have the largest
bullhorn believe otherwise doesn't change the fact
'Where is my fre
th the "wait and see" proposal.
Original Message ----
Subject: Re: Alternative master/main branch proposal (Re: ANN: renaming
of master branch to "main" for core repository and submodules
(dictionaries, help, translations))
Date: 19.03.2021 02:07
From: Mich
On Thu, 2021-03-18 at 21:04 +0100, Luboš Luňák wrote:
> Therefore, I propose that the decision to rename the master branch
> is postponed for as long as the git project does not take a
> definitive stance on it. That stance may take the form of e.g. the
> git project making a statement on it or cha
On 18/03/2021 21.04, Luboš Luňák wrote:
- We are not in any special position here, we are just one of the many
projects using git. Therefore there does not appear to be any need to act on
our own. Presumably the issue gets discussed also elsewhere, and discussing
it here adds little to no value t
Hello,
in order to make the discussion somewhat more constructive, I have an
alternative proposal on how to resolve the problem.
Some pre-requisities:
- There are currently no technical gains to be made from the change. There are
some costs to doing the change, but they are not blocking.
-
