Hi,
On Monday, 2012-02-20 13:42:01 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 13:36 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > But it's normal that the internal copy of LO is outdated. See also icu :-)
>
> Its hard to update icu because the latest versions don't come with the
> makefiles (or sc
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 13:36 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> But it's normal that the internal copy of LO is outdated. See also icu :-)
Its hard to update icu because the latest versions don't come with the
makefiles (or script or whatever they are) to build it with express 2008
under windows, so it
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:15:58AM -0800, julien2412 wrote:
> Just to be sure I didn't misunderstand.
> About http://bugs.debian.org/652784, this one is no more a problem since
> Boost would be used for master.
Yes.
> About http://bugs.debian.org/652681, it means that it's possible only fro
Rene Engelhard wrote
>
> - 3.4.5 had a build fix for boost 1.48, before it didn't build anymore
> (see http://bugs.debian.org/652784 and the mentioned fdo bug)
> - you missed http://bugs.debian.org/652681 because you tried it after
> the fixed version entered testing :-)
>
> But it's normal
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 01:41:59PM -0800, julien2412 wrote:
> I saw that boost package used by LO sources by default was the 1.44 version.
> On debian testing pc x86-64 (with Boost 1.48) and by using
> --with-system-boost in the autogen options, it compiled ok. I thought there
> would be some thin
Hi,
I saw that boost package used by LO sources by default was the 1.44 version.
On debian testing pc x86-64 (with Boost 1.48) and by using
--with-system-boost in the autogen options, it compiled ok. I thought there
would be some things to do in order to compile, did i miss anything ? :-)
Julien
