Re: 5.* series builds defective on Slackware

2016-02-08 Thread Yury Tarasievich
On 08/02/16 22:38, Yury Tarasievich wrote: /apologies for sending this twice, but it seems the list isn't working well/ Actually, it is the Gmane interface to the list that's not working well; can't even get the 'followup' interface open; won't switch to receiving the email stream yet, too.

Re: 5.* series builds defective on Slackware

2016-02-08 Thread jan iversen
Hi > /apologies for sending this twice, but it seems the list isn't working well/ Actually this list works pretty well, but is in general a list for developers, who want to contribute. I assume (without knowing it for a fact), that the reason you did not get a reply to your first email, was th

5.* series builds defective on Slackware

2016-02-08 Thread Yury Tarasievich
Hi all, /apologies for sending this twice, but it seems the list isn't working well/ Building from 5.1.0.* sources on 64-bit Slackware (14.1 and 14.2 beta) produces a build defective in a very important aspect -- such build opens the fairly big document overly slow. Things go like this: u

5.* series builds defective on Slackware

2016-02-07 Thread Yury Tarasievich
Hi all, Building from 5.1.0.* sources on 64-bit Slackware (14.1 and 14.2 beta) produces a build defective in a very important aspect -- such build opens the fairly big document overly slow. Things go like this: unpacking stage passes quick (judging by the status bar), then UI updates stop,