Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

Hi bfo, bfo píše v St 13. 06. 2012 v 10:46 -0700: > Petr Mladek wrote > > > > Create the wiki pages about getting the windows > > backtrace. > > > Hi. > Draft is available at > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/How_to_get_a_backtrace_with_WinDbg. Great work! I really like that it is so detail

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

Petr Mladek wrote > > Create the wiki pages about getting the windows > backtrace. > Hi. Draft is available at https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/How_to_get_a_backtrace_with_WinDbg. LO Windows developers are asked to comment: - what debug output do they actually need - which additional WinDbg c

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

Hi bfo, I am sorry for the late replay. I had busy days. On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 08:55 -0700, bfo wrote: > Petr Mladek wrote > > Yes, any help is really appreciated. If you feel like, please propose > > some prioritization. > > > > From my users perspective the proposal is simple: > 1. crashers

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 07:11:03PM +0200, Nino wrote: > I gave it a (first) try :) Looking much better already. Thanks! Best, Bjoern ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffic

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

On 04.06.2012 18:02, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:55:59AM -0700, bfo wrote: I thought so, but according to http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugTriage there are three bold ANDs before you can change a status to NEW. Further more, an exclamation mark at the end of that pa

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

Bjoern Michaelsen schrieb: can we make that text less scary? ;) Hi, the logic is ok, but the sentence is really adult tapeworm, please feel free to make that more readable. Best regards Rainer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freed

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

Hi Rainer, On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:55:59AM -0700, bfo wrote: > I thought so, but according to http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugTriage > there are three bold ANDs before you can change a status to NEW. > Further more, an exclamation mark at the end of that paragraph > (and the whole scary

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

Petr Mladek wrote > > If you prepare the pages and template and > if it is easy to add new week, Michael might do it himself in the > future. > Firefox team is using CreateBox Wiki Extension for minutes - check their wiki page at https://wiki.mozilla.org/Platform#Meetings > Yes, any help is

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 13:10 -0700, bfo wrote: > Michael Meeks-2 wrote > > > I think it won't do any good in the long term. Enabling reporting tool would > give you a chance to > get more data without the need to know the bugzilla magic by the users (just > opt in to send the reports). > It could

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] crasher bugs and most annoying bugs generated by automation [was: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...]

Bjoern Michaelsen schrieb: As Ubuntu, we do: https://errors.ubuntu.com/ boaster ;-) Hi, yes, I think such automatted statistics can be a good indicator. Best regards Rainer ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://

crasher bugs and most annoying bugs generated by automation [was: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...]

Hi, On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:35:23AM -0700, bfo wrote: > I read that you have unused reporting tool in the codebase and plans > to bring it back to life. Without it do you know the top crashers? As Ubuntu, we do: Crash counter (search for libreoffice-core): https://errors.ubuntu.com/ Open

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

Michael Meeks-2 wrote > > On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 11:35 -0700, bfo wrote: >> I read that you have unused reporting tool in the codebase and plans >> to bring it back to life. Without it do you know the top crashers? > Not really; we rely on human bug filing and QA to bring these to our > atte

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

bfo píše v Po 28. 05. 2012 v 08:37 -0700: > bfo wrote > > > > As I wrote earlier I have pdb symbols and source links in the WinDbg > > outputs, > > but I am concerned about missing FAULTING_SOURCE_LINE and > > FAULTING_SOURCE_CODE sections. > > > > I managed to receive outputs with FAULTING_SOUR

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

bfo wrote > > As I wrote earlier I have pdb symbols and source links in the WinDbg > outputs, > but I am concerned about missing FAULTING_SOURCE_LINE and > FAULTING_SOURCE_CODE sections. > I managed to receive outputs with FAULTING_SOURCE_CODE section just as in Jesus screencast. FAULTING_SOURC

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

Hi there, On Fri, 2012-05-25 at 11:35 -0700, bfo wrote: > I read that you have unused reporting tool in the codebase and plans > to bring it back to life. Without it do you know the top crashers? Not really; we rely on human bug filing and QA to bring these to our attention; of course, lo

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Petr Mladek - pmla...@suse.cz wrote: > We are already using Litmus and are going to migrate to Moztrap. Though, > we are not familiar with the real processes that used in the Mozilla > project. > Do you have any experience with the Mozilla processes? Are you able to

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Petr Mladek - pmla...@suse.cz wrote: >> but I am not sure if my WinDbg output is any good. > It is probably less informative without the .pdb files. Anyway, I guess > that your are on the right way. As I wrote earlier I have pdb symbols and source links in the Win

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

bfo.bugm...@spamgourmet.com píše v Čt 24. 05. 2012 v 21:20 +0200: > On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Petr Mladek - pmla...@suse.cz wrote: > >> Please consider. Always you can ask the friendly guys at Mozilla how > >> to set this all up... > > Thanks for tip. > > What a discovery! Seems like comple

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

Petr Mladek schrieb: Norbert, would be possible to hack the tindebox script to upload also the .pdb file? I managed to get WinDbg to work Me too, with build from tinderbox 20, but gives error message "missing symbols". I will contin

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

Hi bfo, it is great that you continue working on it. Please, do not remove people from CC. There is a lot of traffic on the mailing list. The interested people might miss your replay :-) bfo.bugm...@spamgourmet.com píše v Čt 24. 05. 2012 v 19:56 +0200: > I just read in ESC minutes that daily bui

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Petr Mladek - pmla...@suse.cz wrote: >> Please consider. Always you can ask the friendly guys at Mozilla how >> to set this all up... > Thanks for tip. What a discovery! Seems like complete how to: http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/Mozilla_Source_and_Symbol

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Petr Mladek - pmla...@suse.cz wrote: > bfo.bugm...@spamgourmet.com píše v Pá 18. 05. 2012 v 22:22 +0200: > > On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 12:13 +0200, Jesús Corrius wrote: > > > In any case, the right way to do it would be to automatically generate > > > all PDBs for each

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

bfo.bugm...@spamgourmet.com píše v Pá 18. 05. 2012 v 22:22 +0200: > On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 12:13 +0200, Jesús Corrius wrote: > > In any case, the right way to do it would be to automatically generate > > all PDBs for each released version, for example in: solver\wntmsci.pro\pdb. > > Then we put thos

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 12:13 +0200, Jesús Corrius wrote: > In any case, the right way to do it would be to automatically generate > all PDBs for each released version, for example in: solver\wntmsci.pro\pdb. > Then we put those generated PDBs online at symbols.libreoffice.org. >> I think first we sh

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

On 10/05/12 13:13, Andras Timar wrote: > Using PDB files for release builds does not sound good to me, because > I don't think we should produce release builds with debug > configuration (i.e. no optimizations). ah, another developer who doesn't know what our configure options do (or are supposed

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

> Using PDB files for release builds does not sound good to me, because > I don't think we should produce release builds with debug > configuration (i.e. no optimizations). But we could publish pdb files even for builds with optimization. Microsoft does that for the Windows system DLLs. --tml ___

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

2012/5/10 Tor Lillqvist : >>> Then we put those generated PDBs online at symbols.libreoffice.org. > > But is it documented how to set up such a symbol server? And would we > then need to bump the version numbers in the DLLs/EXEs in each and > every nightly build? Presumably the MS debuggers want to

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

>> Then we put those generated PDBs online at symbols.libreoffice.org. But is it documented how to set up such a symbol server? And would we then need to bump the version numbers in the DLLs/EXEs in each and every nightly build? Presumably the MS debuggers want to be quite sure that some symbol fi

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 12:13 +0200, Jesús Corrius wrote: > In any case, the right way to do it would be to automatically generate > all PDBs for each released version, for example in: solver\wntmsci.pro\pdb. > Then we put those generated PDBs online at symbols.libreoffice.org. Right ! I wo

Re: 3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi there, > >        Trying to get a good stack trace from vcl, I downloaded 3.5.3rc1 from: > >        http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/win32-debug/libreoffice-3-5/ > >        I get a beautiful crash in the MSVC++ debugger, but no symbols; I

3.5.3rc1 win32 / debug package ...

Hi there, Trying to get a good stack trace from vcl, I downloaded 3.5.3rc1 from: http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/win32-debug/libreoffice-3-5/ I get a beautiful crash in the MSVC++ debugger, but no symbols; I try to add vcllo.pdb from LOdev 3.5\program and it moans: "The