Re: [REVIEW 3-6][REVIEW 3-6-0] fdo#52240 add uncontroversial date acceptance patterns

2012-07-27 Thread Petr Mladek
Eike Rathke píše v Pá 27. 07. 2012 v 11:29 +0200: > Hi Petr, > > On Friday, 2012-07-27 11:21:43 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > > > Eike Rathke píše v Čt 26. 07. 2012 v 12:23 +0200: > > > On Thursday, 2012-07-26 09:52:14 +0200, David Tardon wrote: > > > > > that enable abbreviated date input for loca

Re: [REVIEW 3-6][REVIEW 3-6-0] fdo#52240 add uncontroversial date acceptance patterns

2012-07-27 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Eike, On 2012-07-27 at 11:29 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > > I am not sure if this is intuitive, so it is slightly controversal as > > well => we should not risk it for rc4. > > Hum? The fraction input did not change, that was always the case. An > input of "23/42" never yielded a numeric value

Re: [REVIEW 3-6][REVIEW 3-6-0] fdo#52240 add uncontroversial date acceptance patterns

2012-07-27 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Petr, On Friday, 2012-07-27 11:21:43 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > Eike Rathke píše v Čt 26. 07. 2012 v 12:23 +0200: > > On Thursday, 2012-07-26 09:52:14 +0200, David Tardon wrote: > > > > that enable abbreviated date input for locales that use '/' date > > > > separator, which, contrary to '.'

Re: [REVIEW 3-6][REVIEW 3-6-0] fdo#52240 add uncontroversial date acceptance patterns

2012-07-27 Thread Petr Mladek
Eike Rathke píše v Čt 26. 07. 2012 v 12:23 +0200: > Hi David, > > On Thursday, 2012-07-26 09:52:14 +0200, David Tardon wrote: > > > > that enable abbreviated date input for locales that use '/' date > > > separator, which, contrary to '.' and '-', are uncontroversial > > > > Hm, are they? What i

Re: [REVIEW 3-6][REVIEW 3-6-0] fdo#52240 add uncontroversial date acceptance patterns

2012-07-26 Thread David Tardon
Hi, On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:23:49PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi David, > > On Thursday, 2012-07-26 09:52:14 +0200, David Tardon wrote: > > > > that enable abbreviated date input for locales that use '/' date > > > separator, which, contrary to '.' and '-', are uncontroversial > > > > Hm,

Re: [REVIEW 3-6][REVIEW 3-6-0] fdo#52240 add uncontroversial date acceptance patterns

2012-07-26 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi David, On Thursday, 2012-07-26 09:52:14 +0200, David Tardon wrote: > > that enable abbreviated date input for locales that use '/' date > > separator, which, contrary to '.' and '-', are uncontroversial > > Hm, are they? What if I want to insert a fraction? Or am I missing > something (very p

Re: [REVIEW 3-6][REVIEW 3-6-0] fdo#52240 add uncontroversial date acceptance patterns

2012-07-26 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:55:55PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > Please review (date acceptance patterns, xml locale data changes only) > and cherry-pick to 3-6 and if possible, in case we'll do 3.6.0.4rc, > 3-6-0 > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=7828847618b58ff2009b5ce55

Re: [REVIEW 3-6][REVIEW 3-6-0] fdo#52240 add uncontroversial date acceptance patterns

2012-07-26 Thread David Tardon
Hi, On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 05:55:55PM +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi, > > Please review (date acceptance patterns, xml locale data changes only) > and cherry-pick to 3-6 and if possible, in case we'll do 3.6.0.4rc, > 3-6-0 > > that enable abbreviated date input for locales that use '/' date > s

[REVIEW 3-6][REVIEW 3-6-0] fdo#52240 add uncontroversial date acceptance patterns

2012-07-25 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi, Please review (date acceptance patterns, xml locale data changes only) and cherry-pick to 3-6 and if possible, in case we'll do 3.6.0.4rc, 3-6-0 http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=7828847618b58ff2009b5ce55416a8b2e5dcf55a http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit