Re: [REVIEW 3-5] Custom Shapes compile speedup ... #2

2012-03-02 Thread Michael Meeks
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 20:46 +0100, Radek Doulik wrote: > On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 19:51 +0100, Radek Doulik wrote: > > thanks. The patch looks good to me. Pushed. I just pushed a lot more of this stuff to master, basically out-lining all those (exception throwing => hard-to-optimise) object

Re: [REVIEW 3-5] Custom Shapes compile speedup ...

2012-03-02 Thread Radek Doulik
Hi again, On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 19:51 +0100, Radek Doulik wrote: > Hi Michael, > > thanks. The patch looks good to me. Pushed. > > It doesn't change the properties data, so it shouldn't break anything. I > guess I will cook another sample document containing all presets for > easier future testi

Re: [REVIEW 3-5] Custom Shapes compile speedup ...

2012-03-02 Thread Radek Doulik
Hi Michael, thanks. The patch looks good to me. Pushed. It doesn't change the properties data, so it shouldn't break anything. I guess I will cook another sample document containing all presets for easier future testing. Cheers Radek On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 17:44 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi

[REVIEW 3-5] Custom Shapes compile speedup ...

2012-03-02 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi guys, I'd like to propose this for cherry-picking: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=f291fb57d087de41385a22dfacd8b694d8b9abc7 the rather large and tedious patch it generates is this: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=d4157cefc5416eb