Re: [REVIEW] domain-mapper import speedup patch ...

2013-01-08 Thread Michael Meeks
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 14:15 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > there may be more places where a similar approach could be applicable, > both in API implementations in sw and in writerfilter/xmloff import > code, e.g. see cc99bb9f383a65912d004e227a5b6a88b401bbba which was purely > result of me debugging

Re: [REVIEW] domain-mapper import speedup patch ...

2013-01-08 Thread Michael Stahl
On 21/12/12 17:55, Michael Meeks wrote: > There are probably better ways to do this :-) clearly it would be nice > to manage layered SfxItemSets via UNO in an even more performant and > elegant way that doesn't rely on great big uno PropertyValue sequences > getting sent repeatedly and so on.

Re: [REVIEW] domain-mapper import speedup patch ...

2013-01-02 Thread Miklos Vajna
Hi Michael, On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 04:55:44PM +, Michael Meeks wrote: > I attach a prototype patch. It passes make check and make slowcheck in > sw/ (not tried subsequentcheck). That makes a lot of sense, we also do something similar for section properties in http://opengrok.libreoff

[REVIEW] domain-mapper import speedup patch ...

2012-12-21 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi guys, Still annoyed by the (increasingly small) RTF performance regressions[1], and given that the profiling now shows the domain-mapper's use/abuse of the core as being the main factor (at least for file 3 in [1]). I attach a prototype patch. It passes make check and make slow