On 01/03/12 05:09, Michael Meeks wrote:
Looks a bit scary for 3.5.1 after RC1 surely ? or has this been
well-tested elsewhere ?
I guess
if so a further +1 from me, coincidently I made the same change locally
> today whilst investigating a large import doc, definitely improved the
> import tim
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 22:53 +, Noel Power wrote:
> and for 3-5-1 ( or is it too late ) ?
Looks a bit scary for 3.5.1 after RC1 surely ? or has this been
well-tested elsewhere ?
> if so a further +1 from me, coincidently I made the same change locally
> today whilst investigating a l
and for 3-5-1 ( or is it too late ) ?
if so a further +1 from me, coincidently I made the same change locally
today whilst investigating a large import doc, definitely improved the
import time
Noel
On 29/02/12 22:09, Michael Stahl wrote:
the following fixes a performance regression in OOo 3.
the following fixes a performance regression in OOo 3.4;
i have actually fixed this before in OOo times but the fix somehow got
lost in the CWS process overhead... ah, the issue for it was this:
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=115684
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/com