[PUSHED] sal_Bool to bool

Hi, Thank you for your patch! It has been merged to LibreOffice. If you are interested in details, please visit https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/3537 Approvals: Fridrich Strba: Verified; Looks good to me, approved -- To view, visit https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/3537 To unsubscribe, vis

[PUSHED] sal_Bool to bool in sw/source/ui/shells/grfsh.cxx

Hi, Thank you for your patch! It has been merged to LibreOffice. If you are interested in details, please visit https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/1425 Approvals: Norbert Thiebaud: Verified; Looks good to me, approved -- To view, visit https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/1425 To unsubscribe, vi

[PUSHED] sal_Bool to bool

Hi, Thank you for your patch! :-) It has been merged to LibreOffice. If you are interested in details, please visit https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/979 Approvals: Norbert Thiebaud: Verified; Looks good to me, approved -- To view, visit https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/979 To unsubscribe,

[PUSHED] sal_Bool to bool conversion in accessibility

Hi, Thank you for your patch! :-) It has been merged to LibreOffice. If you are interested in details, please visit https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/701 Approvals: Noel Power: Verified; Looks good to me, approved -- To view, visit https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/701 To unsubscribe, visit

Re: [PUSHED] sal_Bool to bool conversions

On 09/26/2012 12:21 PM, Noel Power wrote: On 26/09/12 11:11, Noel Power wrote: On 25/09/12 13:48, Noel Grandin wrote: These patches do some sal_Bool to bool conversions. One of the patches drops 2 unused sal_Bool fields. They have passed a full make check. the looked ok to me, will push all (

[PUSHED] sal_Bool to bool and some rtl::OUStrings in avmedia

Hi, Thank you for your patch! :-) It has been merged to LibreOffice. If you are interested in details, please visit https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/697 Approvals: Noel Power: Verified; Looks good to me, approved -- To view, visit https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/697 To unsubscribe, visit