Bah, I meant to reply to this but got hung up with something else and forgot
On 21/08/12 17:33, János Uray wrote:
the Layout class has some virtual methods with no implementation,
this sounds like these need to be pure virtual making Layout an
abstract class ( which makes sense ) Whe
> the Layout class has some virtual methods with no implementation, this
> sounds like these need to be pure virtual making Layout an abstract class (
> which makes sense ) When I looked a little close at some of those methods I
> notice
>
IMO, not all empty virtual functions need to be pure virtua
Hi János
On 17/08/12 09:49, Noel Power wrote:
Anyway I think if this runs ok ( I will try it later ) I would be
inclined to just check it in, the benefits from this change far
outweigh any new minor bugs that might be introduced. I will attempt
to review or at least scan the resulting new code
