On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 21:56 +0200, Santiago Martinez wrote:
> This patch removes unused code as listed in unusedcode.easy
Yup, pushed now. Well, actually Julien removed the same code and got in
first.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 15:23 +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> removed unused methods
pushed, thanks for these
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
> FWIW, if a class has only one constructor and that constructor is unused
> then it indicates that the whole class (except perhaps for any static
> methods it might have) should be possible to be removed.
Sorry, I'll think more next time.
Petr
___
LibreO
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 16:23 +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> yet another remove unused code patch.
Pushed now, thanks for this.
FWIW, if a class has only one constructor and that constructor is unused
then it indicates that the whole class (except perhaps for any static
methods it might
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 16:27 +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> another bits of unused code removed.
looks good, pushed now, thanks for these.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman
On Sun, 2012-03-25 at 20:43 +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> removed some code from oox.
Pushed, looks good. I suspect that this will have a bit of a cascade
effect and a pile more stuff will become available for removal on the
next run.
C.
__
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 14:40 +0100, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> some unused code removed (oox, sc).
Looks good to me, pushed now, thanks for these.
C.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mai
