Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#21).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
.
Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#20).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
.
Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#19).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
.
Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#18).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
.
Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#17).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
.
Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#16).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
.
Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#15).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
.
Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#14).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
.
Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#13).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
.
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 02:22:54PM +0200, Thomas Arnhold wrote:
> are those OUString(buf.getStr()) necessary? I think it's working as
> it was before :)
> See sax/qa/cppunit/test_converter.cxx (afaik it's only in this file):
> -SAL_INFO("sax.cppunit","" << buf.getStr());
> +SAL_INFO("sax
Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#12).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
.
Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#11).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
.
On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 22:40 +0200, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Caolán McNamara
> wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 17:52 +0200, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
>
> > I almost completed the conversion of the Delete Contents
> dialog in
>
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 17:52 +0200, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
>
> > I almost completed the conversion of the Delete Contents dialog in
> > Calc (see patch #1)
>
> What's missing from your patch is the .ui file itself, do a git
> add /path/to
On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 17:52 +0200, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
> I almost completed the conversion of the Delete Contents dialog in
> Calc (see patch #1)
What's missing from your patch is the .ui file itself, do a git
add /path/to/that/file.ui and git commit --amend
> What I didn't manage to do wa
Correction, the second reference is:
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sc/source/ui/view/cellsh1.cxx#362
/Albert
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Albert Thuswaldner <
albert.thuswald...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Caolán,
> Thanks for your excellent tutorial on WidgetLayout conversion:
>
>
>
Hi Caolán,
Thanks for your excellent tutorial on WidgetLayout conversion:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/WidgetLayout#HOWTO:_Step_by_step_dialog_conversion
With the help of this I almost completed the conversion of the Delete
Contents dialog in Calc (see patch #1)
What I didn't
Hello LibreOffice gerrit bot, Eike Rathke,
I'd like you to reexamine a change. Please visit
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
to look at the new patch set (#10).
Change subject: WIP: date/time IDL datatypes incompatible change
.
Hi,
I have submitted a patch for review:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2944
To pull it, you can do:
git pull ssh://gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/core refs/changes/44/2944/1
wip
Change-Id: I23427e1e3bfb583ef10123577ebec76af617f917
---
M vcl/inc/vcl/bitmap.hxx
M vcl/source/gdi/bitmap.cx
Hi,
I have submitted a patch for review:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2783
To pull it, you can do:
git pull ssh://gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/core refs/changes/83/2783/1
WIP: time datatypes to nanosecond precision
Change-Id: I761a1b0b8731c82f19a0c37acbcf43d3c06d6cd6
---
M basic/sou
Hi,
I have submitted a patch for review:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/2144
To pull it, you can do:
git pull ssh://gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/core refs/changes/44/2144/1
WiP: Remove the need to manually register libs in scp2
- we have all the needed information in gbuild
- reduce t
Hi,
I have submitted a patch for review:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/1343
To pull it, you can do:
git pull ssh://gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/core refs/changes/43/1343/1
WIP fdo#56124 add IFERROR and IFNA to calc
Change-Id: If0145363ed7495a6633d80dabbbfac30af9a0301
---
M formula/in
Hi,
I have submitted a patch for review:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/1207
To pull it, you can do:
git pull ssh://gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/core refs/changes/07/1207/1
WIP: move base check for bibliography to sfx2
- in the libbiblio component the frame is already created, and a f
Hi,
I have submitted a patch for review:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/1071
To pull it, you can do:
git pull ssh://gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/core refs/changes/71/1071/1
WIP: template pack installer
- so this adds a button to the templates dialog to install
https://launchpad.net
Hi,
I have submitted a patch for review:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/893
To pull it, you can do:
git pull ssh://gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/core refs/changes/93/893/1
WIP: first stab at converting the insert-row dialog
to UI format
Change-Id: I1b1888f667b31b6ca22d1eca57aeb9da7ce4
Hey Albert,
>
>> Thanks a lot for this amazing work. I added it to the 3.6 release notes page.
>
> I added a reference to the bug and a screenshot to the release notes.
Great. The screenshot looks really good.
> I have a few things lined up which I want to do next. For instance, do
> you mind if
HI Marcus,
Sorry for not replying until now. Forgot to CC the list again...
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Markus Mohrhard
wrote:
> Hey Albert,
>
>>
>> I already had a quick look at the closing problem and it seems it is
>> not a crash. It looks more like a missing close handler which results
>>
Hey Albert,
>
> I already had a quick look at the closing problem and it seems it is
> not a crash. It looks more like a missing close handler which results
> in the parent window being closed which is in this case the LibO
> window but I need to spend some more time on it. I will spend next
> wee
Hey Albert,
2012/5/24 Albert Thuswaldner :
> Hi Andras,
> Thanks for taking your time to reply.
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Andras Timar wrote:
>> Hi Albert,
>>
>> 2012/5/18 Markus Mohrhard :
>>>
>>> This one is quite simple. we need to move the identifiers out of the 0
>>> to 255 range.
Hi Andras,
Thanks for taking your time to reply.
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Andras Timar wrote:
> Hi Albert,
>
> 2012/5/18 Markus Mohrhard :
>>
>> This one is quite simple. we need to move the identifiers out of the 0
>> to 255 range.
>>
>> Andras, do you have an idea what range is useable
Hi Albert,
2012/5/18 Markus Mohrhard :
>
> This one is quite simple. we need to move the identifiers out of the 0
> to 255 range.
>
> Andras, do you have an idea what range is useable in sc for this? I
> think most of the 256 to 999 range is already used but I have no idea
> where to check this.
Hi Markus,
Forgot to CC the list in my previous mail, sorry for the noise.
The patch in the last mail was also wrong.
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Markus Mohrhard
wrote:
> Hello Albert,
>
> Sorry that it took me a bit to review your patch but my master trees
> are totally screwed for my own
Hi Marcus,
Here is an updated patch which I hope you have time to review. I'm
sure that there are things that can be done differently, but basically
the patch works.
I have found two problems myself that I need help resolving:
1.) Compile time waring about resources ids. There is probably a
simpl
Servus Markus,
Just an update on what I've been doing on this.
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Markus Mohrhard
wrote:
>> So far so good I think, then comes the ugly bits:
>>
>> 1.) Obviously I'm using the wrong widget class for ScSortKeyDlg since
>> each dialog opens in a separate window and ar
Hey Albert,
> So I have hacked a bit on the UI for the new sort dialog in calc. I'm
> posting my work-in-progress patch hoping to get confirmation that I'm
> on the right track and also help with the specific issues below.
>
> As you suggested I've used the same concept for as in namedlg, where
Hi Markus,
So I have hacked a bit on the UI for the new sort dialog in calc. I'm
posting my work-in-progress patch hoping to get confirmation that I'm
on the right track and also help with the specific issues below.
As you suggested I've used the same concept for as in namedlg, where I
created ScS
Hi Markus and Michael,
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:57, Markus Mohrhard
wrote:
> Hey Michael,
>
> thanks for looking into this.
>
>>
>> my fix actually tried to do this for one of them, but i've noticed that
>> in table3.cxx there is code that hard-codes sorting related arrays to
>> size 3, which cr
Hey Michael,
thanks for looking into this.
>
> my fix actually tried to do this for one of them, but i've noticed that
> in table3.cxx there is code that hard-codes sorting related arrays to
> size 3, which crashes when you add back the code that i've commented
> out; at that point i thought this
On 24/03/12 01:26, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
> Hi Markus,
> Thanks for your review.
>
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 01:14, Markus Mohrhard
> wrote:
>>
>> Ok. So as promised I reviewed the patch now. Sadly there are some more
>> problems than I thought after my first quick look:
also, this thing cras
Hi Markus,
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 18:36, Markus Mohrhard
wrote:
> And had to revert it immediately. We can use initializer lists because
> older gcc versions don't know this feature. I got spammed by nearly
> every of our tinderbox. I tried to fix them but the whole patch is
> build around that
Hello Albert,
>
> sorry that it took me some time but I had a long fight with our chart
> interpolation algorithm and was not able to update my tree for more
> than a week.
>
>>> - ScSortDescriptor::FillSortParam looks like there might happen some
>>> index out of bounds access
>>
>> So I have upd
Hello Albert,
sorry that it took me some time but I had a long fight with our chart
interpolation algorithm and was not able to update my tree for more
than a week.
>> - ScSortDescriptor::FillSortParam looks like there might happen some
>> index out of bounds access
>
> So I have updated the patc
Hey Albert,
> I will check this patch tomorrow. A quick look through the patch did
> not show any serious problems only some small nit-picks that I will
> change while reviewing.
>
Ok. So as promised I reviewed the patch now. Sadly there are some more
problems than I thought after my first quick
Hey Albert,
2012/3/20 Albert Thuswaldner :
> Hi Markus,
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 04:27, Markus Mohrhard
> wrote:
>> Hello Albert,
>>
>> I have a simple idea that shouldn't be too complex to implement. I
>> think we can agree that only the sort entries are the difficult part.
>> I would create
Hello Albert,
2012/3/15 Albert Thuswaldner :
> Hi Markus,
> So I have hacked on this a bit, progress has been slow, detours and so
> on. Anyhow, I think have now completed the step 1, i.e changed the
> underlying code removing the static limit. I've have tried to keep
> much of the old structure f
Hi Albert,
Then you are a lot further then I am. I'll leave you to it. Please state
in the ticket when you are working on it. That way nobody will work on
the ticket when you are busy with it.
Greetings,
Rob Snelders
On 28-05-11 21:46, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Sat, May 28, 2011
Hi Rob,
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 01:01, Rob Snelders wrote:
> Hi Albert,
>
> I have worked on this bug before I heard that you had already worked on it.
> Did you work any further on it? Maybe we can callaborate on it?
Oh, how far did you come? I think I basically have done most of it by now.
>
Hi Albert,
I have worked on this bug before I heard that you had already worked on
it. Did you work any further on it? Maybe we can callaborate on it?
I have found the place where the number of sheets is set. This is in
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/calc/sc/source/core/tool/appoptio.cxx
Hi Kohei,
Thanks for your help.
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 21:19, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 17:09 +0200, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
>> Dear List,
>> As a first attempt to contribute some code to LO, I've started hacking
>> on his:
>>
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3
On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 17:09 +0200, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
> Dear List,
> As a first attempt to contribute some code to LO, I've started hacking
> on his:
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33293
>
> I think I have come quite far with implementing the changes to the
> configuratio
Hi again,
In case my original email got stuck in peoples spam filter (I
accidentally managed to send it as a HTML mail) here it is again.
If it still went through, sorry for spamming the list.
Regards,
/Albert
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 17:09, Albert Thuswaldner
wrote:
> Dear List,
> As a first attem
Dear List,
As a first attempt to contribute some code to LO, I've started hacking on
his:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33293
I think I have come quite far with implementing the changes to the
configuration dialog (see the patch). Here there is still some things to do,
like figurin
shell part pushed.
Christina
Am 20.03.2011 00:52, schrieb Xisco Faulí:
Here we go with the first round of patches.
Whitespaces are not deleted anymore and all the bogus have been
deleted. Everything builds allright.
Part 1 -->
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1274885/removed-commented-code-part1.tar.g
Pushed the linguistic part.
Christina
Am 20.03.2011 00:52, schrieb Xisco Faulí:
Here we go with the first round of patches.
Whitespaces are not deleted anymore and all the bogus have been
deleted. Everything builds allright.
Part 1 -->
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1274885/removed-commented-code-pa
Hi,
pushed the framework part. Again a lot of files changed their place so
it was quite a lot of work to apply the patch. Additionally I removed
lots of dates, comments above removed commented methods, {} not needed
anymore after the if () has gone and changed
if ( bState = sal_True) to if (
Pushed avmedia - just to let you know it's going on :-)
Christina
Am 20.03.2011 00:52, schrieb Xisco Faulí:
Here we go with the first round of patches.
Whitespaces are not deleted anymore and all the bogus have been
deleted. Everything builds allright.
Part 1 -->
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1274
Hi,
formula and sfx2 pushed. The files WriterHelper.java and
DocumentMetadataAccess.java changed their place in the code tree but
DocumentMetaData.java seems to have been removed.
Christina
Am 20.03.2011 00:52, schrieb Xisco Faulí:
Here we go with the first round of patches.
Whitespaces ar
Am 20.03.2011 00:52, schrieb Xisco Faulí:
Here we go with the first round of patches.
Whitespaces are not deleted anymore and all the bogus have been
deleted. Everything builds allright.
Part 1 -->
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1274885/removed-commented-code-part1.tar.gz
I'll post the second part so
Here we go with the first round of patches.
Whitespaces are not deleted anymore and all the bogus have been deleted.
Everything builds allright.
Part 1 -->
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1274885/removed-commented-code-part1.tar.gz
I'll post the second part soon
Greetings
2011/3/18 Christina Roßmanith
Patch 0025 now is already pushed but I'll wait until I see a new version
on the ML.
Christina
Am 18.03.2011 22:01, schrieb Xisco Faulí:
Well, i'm working on it again, so it would be better to forget this
patches and wait for the new ones i'm working on.
I'll let you know asap
2011/3/18 Chris
Well, i'm working on it again, so it would be better to forget this patches
and wait for the new ones i'm working on.
I'll let you know asap
2011/3/18 Christina Roßmanith
> Hi,
>
> I've applied patch-0025 locally waiting for a successful build. As
> mentioned earlier whitespace-only changes wer
Hi,
I've applied patch-0025 locally waiting for a successful build. As
mentioned earlier whitespace-only changes were skipped. I'd suggest that
you break patch-0001 into smaller pieces because >1 lines are simply
too much.
Christina
Am 08.03.2011 21:06, schrieb Xisco Faulí:
Hello,
I'
Hi list,
Attached is a patch that improves Writer page as described in
fdo#31251[1]. After a quick poll on various LibreOffice user it appears
that a halo on the four borders is confusing so we have a smooth shadow
on two borders.
There are still some little glitches and book mode is not fully ha
63 matches
Mail list logo
