Re: [PATCH] gbuildification of rhino

2012-10-03 Thread David Tardon
Hi, On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 01:23:41PM +0200, David Tardon wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:37:17AM +0200, David Ostrovsky wrote: > > Hi Norbert, > > > > On 03.10.2012 01:09, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > > >David, > > > > > >to answer your question on IRC. > > > > > >yes the default patc

Re: [PATCH] gbuildification of rhino

2012-10-03 Thread David Tardon
Hi, On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:37:17AM +0200, David Ostrovsky wrote: > Hi Norbert, > > On 03.10.2012 01:09, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: > >David, > > > >to answer your question on IRC. > > > >yes the default patchlevel for gbuild is 3, because most fo the patch > >we had are like that... > really? >

Re: [PATCH] gbuildification of rhino

2012-10-03 Thread David Ostrovsky
Hi Norbert, On 03.10.2012 01:09, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: David, to answer your question on IRC. yes the default patchlevel for gbuild is 3, because most fo the patch we had are like that... really? Currently, in dmake build system all patches are applied with patch level 2. The wrong default

Re: [PATCH] gbuildification of rhino

2012-10-02 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
David, to answer your question on IRC. yes the default patchlevel for gbuild is 3, because most fo the patch we had are like that... BUT, I pushed a patch some time ago so that if a patch is named *. where n is from 0-9, then gbuild will apply that patch with the patchlevel n (regardless of the d

[PATCH] gbuildification of rhino

2012-10-02 Thread David Ostrovsky (via Code Review)
Hi, I have submitted a patch for review: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/752 To pull it, you can do: git pull ssh://gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/core refs/changes/52/752/1 gbuildification of rhino Default patch level 3 was not working here and must be overriden with gb_UnpackedTarball_