Re: [PUSHED on master] Re: [PATCH] fix proposed for fdo#48683

2012-04-14 Thread Kohei Yoshida
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 12:12 PM, julien2412 wrote: > Hi Kohei, > > First thank you for your support. > I commited and pushed the fix on master, see > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=95cc5de63b20c5986fe8f3913da86002eabd7cb1 > > I removed the 3 "delete" + moved the line you

[PUSHED on master] Re: [PATCH] fix proposed for fdo#48683

2012-04-14 Thread julien2412
f I didn't misunderstand what you said on the thread, it mustn't and can't be applied on 3.5 branch so no need to ask review for this. Anyway thank you again. Julien. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/PATCH-fix-proposed-for-fdo-48683-tp3910199p3910415.html

Re: [PATCH] fix proposed for fdo#48683

2012-04-14 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hi Julien, On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > I did refactor this part, and now the text portion container manages > the life cycle of stored containers.  There is no need to delete > stored elements outside of it.  So, you did the right thing here. While you are at it, th

Re: [PATCH] fix proposed for fdo#48683

2012-04-14 Thread Kohei Yoshida
Hi Julien, On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 9:59 AM, julien2412 wrote: > I can commit and push on master of course but I'd like first your opinion > about this since I could missed something. Yup, your fix is right on. Please push to master. I did refactor this part, and now the text portion container

[PATCH] fix proposed for fdo#48683

2012-04-14 Thread julien2412
D_LINEBREAK ) { TextPortion* pNext = pParaPortion->GetTextPortions()[ nPortion ]; I can commit and push on master of course but I'd like first your opinion about this since I could missed something. Julien. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.docum