[PUSHED] Re: [PATCH] fix proposed for fdo#48368

2012-04-16 Thread julien2412
I pushed the commit http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=8bfee2c0eb6fcec49d05562bf1cb945356a4180e for the fix and updated bug status to RESOLVED/FIXED Julien. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/PATCH-fix-proposed-for-fdo-48368

Re: [PATCH] fix proposed for fdo#48368

2012-04-16 Thread julien2412
it = aDeleteVec.begin(); it != aDeleteVec.end(); ++it ) 339 { 340 IDEBaseWindow* pWin = *it; 341 pWin->StoreData(); But perhaps I misunderstood something (which wouldn't be surprising :-)) Julien -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/P

Re: [PATCH] fix proposed for fdo#48368

2012-04-16 Thread Noel Power
On 14/04/12 22:20, julien2412 wrote: Hello, I reproduced the problem indicated by fdo#48368 and attached to the bugtracker bt with symbols (see https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=59985&action=edit) Here are the lines of basctl/source/basicide/basidesh.cxx which seem to cause the pro

[PATCH] fix proposed for fdo#48368

2012-04-14 Thread julien2412
!= m_aCurLibName ) ) I can commit and push on master of course but I'd like first your opinion about this. Julien. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/PATCH-fix-proposed-for-fdo-48368-tp3910905p391