On 24/04/12 19:41, Noel Grandin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 19:03, Michael Stahl wrote:
>>
>> so the first patch, which Caolan already pushed, causes a segfault in
>> dbaccess_complex, because of a double free in
>> SwXTextView::removeSelectionChangeListener: the
>> boost::ptr_vector::erase()
On 04/24/2012 07:03 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
it would of course be nice if the f..ine documentation would mention
that erase() will delete the element, but i can't find that fact
mentioned here:
http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_49_0/libs/ptr_container/doc/ptr_sequence_adapter.html
It kind of im
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 19:03, Michael Stahl wrote:
>
> so the first patch, which Caolan already pushed, causes a segfault in
> dbaccess_complex, because of a double free in
> SwXTextView::removeSelectionChangeListener: the
> boost::ptr_vector::erase() actually deletes the element.
>
Aaaargh. I sh
On 24/04/12 08:56, Noel Grandin wrote:
> Hi
>
> This series of patches converts various datastructures in the SW module
> from SV*PTRARR to std::vector, std::set, and boost::ptr_set variously.
so the first patch, which Caolan already pushed, causes a segfault in
dbaccess_complex, because of a do
