On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 22:55 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 15/02/12 21:31, Kate Goss wrote:
> > Hi Michael, Caolan,
> >
> > How accurate/ up to date is unusedcode.easy? Is there a way to make sure
> > the methods I'm removing are genuinely unused?
Its generally up to date, but it always require
On 15/02/12 21:31, Kate Goss wrote:
> Hi Michael, Caolan,
>
> How accurate/ up to date is unusedcode.easy? Is there a way to make sure
> the methods I'm removing are genuinely unused?
the problem is that unusedcode.easy is generated from a single
configuration of LO. because there is a huge numb
Hi Michael, Caolan,
How accurate/ up to date is unusedcode.easy? Is there a way to make sure
the methods I'm removing are genuinely unused?
Am I just doing it wrong and removing the wrong things? : )
Kate
On 15 February 2012 16:01, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Kate,
>
> On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 21:
Hi Kate,
On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 21:33 +, Kate Goss wrote:
> Please find attached a patch to remove a couple of methods listed in
> unusedcode.easy, from gtkframe.
Sadly they are used - but only for the gtk3 mode that caolan is not
compiling. Perhaps instead if you could move up the
#i
Hi,
Please find attached a patch to remove a couple of methods listed in
unusedcode.easy, from gtkframe.
Kate
From 85b2e98cb31fc7d8968136bf91c01b5589e7a0dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kate Goss
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:10:14 +
Subject: [PATCH] Remove unused methods from gtkframe
Remove
