Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes - QA Call 01/11/2013

2013-01-23 Thread Petr Mladek
On Tue, 2013-01-22 at 07:52 -0800, Joel Madero wrote: > There are quite a few issues with these new rules, mostly due to > limitations with FDO but also because of situations we hadn't > considered. All of this will be discussed on Friday and we'll hopefully > have a final procedure down. > > O

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes - QA Call 01/11/2013

2013-01-22 Thread Joel Madero
On 01/21/2013 10:13 PM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Joel Madero schrieb: -Status clarification (New vs. Reopened) **Agreed: *Reopened should only be used if the bug is assigned *Because of this agreement, modifications have to be made to our current workflow -*Agreed: *NEEDINFO: Used only if most t

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes - QA Call 01/11/2013

2013-01-22 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
julien2412 schrieb: I read quickly this thread, Hello Julien, thx, for feedback, I believe for for further discussion of possibly necessary rethinking of current or planned proceeding we should start a new thread on , here we might discommode devs' workflow. CU Rainer ___

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes - QA Call 01/11/2013

2013-01-22 Thread julien2412
I read quickly this thread, so certainly I'll repeat some things from one or another person here but here's what I'm doing: - if "NEW" or "UNCONFIRMED" and need some info (just 1 or several), I put a comment and put State to NEEDINFO - if "NEEDINFO" without feedback for at least 2 months: - eith

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes - QA Call 01/11/2013

2013-01-21 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Joel Madero schrieb: -Status clarification (New vs. Reopened) **Agreed: *Reopened should only be used if the bug is assigned *Because of this agreement, modifications have to be made to our current workflow -*Agreed: *NEEDINFO: Used only if most the information Hi all, just stumbled upon thes

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes - QA Call 01/11/2013

2013-01-21 Thread Joel Madero
On 01/21/2013 07:08 AM, Eike Rathke wrote: Hi, On Thursday, 2013-01-17 09:43:33 -0800, Joel Madero wrote: -*Agreed: *NEEDINFO: Used only if most the information is there and the bug can be confirmed but additional information would be useful Request that once information is provided, move bug

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes - QA Call 01/11/2013

2013-01-21 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi, On Thursday, 2013-01-17 09:43:33 -0800, Joel Madero wrote: > -*Agreed: *NEEDINFO: Used only if most the information is there and > the bug can be confirmed but additional information would be useful > Request that once information is provided, move bug to NEW not to > UNCONFIRMED or REOPENED

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes - QA Call 01/11/2013

2013-01-21 Thread Petr Mladek
bfo píše v Čt 17. 01. 2013 v 13:29 -0800: > Hi! > Please explain little more the following: > > > jmadero wrote > > -Status clarification (New vs. Reopened) > > **Agreed: *Reopened should only be used if the bug is assigned > > - often Reopened status is used by the Reporters when bug is marked

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes - QA Call 01/11/2013

2013-01-17 Thread bfo
Hi! Please explain little more the following: jmadero wrote > -Status clarification (New vs. Reopened) > **Agreed: *Reopened should only be used if the bug is assigned - often Reopened status is used by the Reporters when bug is marked as INVALID, DUPLICATE or WFM, how this new policy will work

[Libreoffice-qa] Minutes - QA Call 01/11/2013

2013-01-17 Thread Joel Madero
*Time Start: 1400 UTC Participants: Bjoern, Joel, Joren *Completed Action Items +FDO +Version goes into comments from BSA [Rob] +Bugzilla OpenID or Alternatives [Bjoern] *No way to implement, no alternatives +Funding +Request money from BoD for QA Priz