Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Issues with 3.5.0 - ready for release ...

2012-02-09 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Cor Nouws wrote: > As promised to Thorsten on Sunday, I've been looking at 3.5.0 and issues. > [...] Cor, thanks a whole lot. It is much appreciated! -- Thorsten pgpfluwyepPb1.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@li

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Issues with 3.5.0 - ready for release ...

2012-02-08 Thread Dag Wieers
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Markus Mohrhard wrote: 2012/2/8 Caolán McNamara : On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 22:05 +0100, Markus Mohrhard wrote: But keep in mind that this is nothing that will be fast. I needed around one week to check a bit more than 4000 files My times are dramatically faster than this for

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Issues with 3.5.0 - ready for release ...

2012-02-08 Thread Markus Mohrhard
2012/2/8 Caolán McNamara : > On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 22:05 +0100, Markus Mohrhard wrote: >> But keep in mind that this is nothing that will be fast. I needed >> around one week to check a bit more than 4000 files > > My times are dramatically faster than this for .doc files in writer at > least. I ca

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Issues with 3.5.0 - ready for release ...

2012-02-08 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 22:05 +0100, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > But keep in mind that this is nothing that will be fast. I needed > around one week to check a bit more than 4000 files My times are dramatically faster than this for .doc files in writer at least. I can load 4000 .doc files *under valgri

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Issues with 3.5.0 - ready for release ...

2012-02-07 Thread Markus Mohrhard
Hey, I added the list back again. 2012/2/7 Dag Wieers : > On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > >> But keep in mind that this is nothing that will be fast. I needed >> around one week to check a bit more than 4000 files. Anyway it would >> be great if you could help out doing the same for

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Issues with 3.5.0 - ready for release ...

2012-02-07 Thread Markus Mohrhard
Hey, 2012/2/7 Caolán McNamara : > On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 20:32 +0100, Dag Wieers wrote: >> Do we >> have tests doing automated QA (conversions) to test export filters and are >> we using fuzzing techniques to test our import filters ? > > I've personally been to-date more interested in automated im

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Issues with 3.5.0 - ready for release ...

2012-02-07 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 20:32 +0100, Dag Wieers wrote: > Do we > have tests doing automated QA (conversions) to test export filters and are > we using fuzzing techniques to test our import filters ? I've personally been to-date more interested in automated import filter tests, typically various bi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Issues with 3.5.0 - ready for release ...

2012-02-07 Thread Dag Wieers
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Cor Nouws wrote: But the quick look I had at the rough list in the train this morning, showed crashes and such but as far as I could judge with special documents. Great issues to solve for the next release(s) ... I can demonstrate issues with some filters during conversion

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Issues with 3.5.0 - ready for release ...

2012-02-07 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Petr, Petr Mladek wrote (07-02-12 11:01) So, though the overall impression is OK (as is with builds from the master) as long that checking issues from the last weeks is not clear, I would not bet on it. I have the same feeling. (I read your text below as the opposite ;-) ) Well, we hav

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Issues with 3.5.0 - ready for release ...

2012-02-07 Thread Petr Mladek
Cor Nouws píše v Út 07. 02. 2012 v 01:08 +0100: > Hi, > > As promised to Thorsten on Sunday, I've been looking at 3.5.0 and issues. > > I looked at issues that I've seen, that are at 37361 and at the 44 > issues filed during our second BugHuntSession (little delay :-\ ) > > Added some comments,