[Libreoffice-commits] .: 2 commits - configure.in README.cross

2012-08-09 Thread Tor Lillqvist
README.cross |4 configure.in | 16 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) New commits: commit 3dd05633bf29dcad613d6787c2a57ea2db2216f7 Author: Tor Lillqvist Date: Thu Aug 9 23:57:15 2012 +0300 Can use simpler autogen.lastrun now Change-Id:

Re: [Libreoffice-commits] .: 2 commits - configure.in README.cross

2012-05-20 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> Advance notice would be appreciated so that I can find a way to adapt > tinderbuild2 Sure. That's why I didn't want to remove the (as such superseded) --with-*-for-build options, but just give a gentle hint. Anyway, the change I did was enough to improve the itch I had to scratch at the time, I

Re: [Libreoffice-commits] .: 2 commits - configure.in README.cross

2012-05-19 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 4:39 AM, David Tardon wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:59:40AM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote: >> > Why not? Changing the inner configure call to >> > >> > ./configure `cat configure.lastrun.build` >> >> Sure, but then there would be a discrepancy with how autogen.lastrun >>

Re: [Libreoffice-commits] .: 2 commits - configure.in README.cross

2012-05-18 Thread David Tardon
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:59:40AM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > Why not? Changing the inner configure call to > > > > ./configure `cat configure.lastrun.build` > > Sure, but then there would be a discrepancy with how autogen.lastrun > works. Or should we realize already that autogen.lastrun isn

Re: [Libreoffice-commits] .: 2 commits - configure.in README.cross

2012-05-18 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> Why not? Changing the inner configure call to > > ./configure `cat configure.lastrun.build` Sure, but then there would be a discrepancy with how autogen.lastrun works. Or should we realize already that autogen.lastrun isn't actually valued by developers as a "backup copy" of their last autogen.s

Re: [Libreoffice-commits] .: 2 commits - configure.in README.cross

2012-05-18 Thread David Tardon
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:40:13AM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > This is a good idea, but I think it would be even better to have > > autogen.lastrun.build (or whatever you want to call it). Then we would > > not need to specify _any_ build-specific options for the host configure. > > Opinions? >

Re: [Libreoffice-commits] .: 2 commits - configure.in README.cross

2012-05-18 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> This is a good idea, but I think it would be even better to have > autogen.lastrun.build (or whatever you want to call it). Then we would > not need to specify _any_ build-specific options for the host configure. > Opinions? I don't think that would be easy to implement, and in any case, then we

Re: [Libreoffice-commits] .: 2 commits - configure.in README.cross

2012-05-18 Thread David Tardon
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:41:52PM -0700, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > commit 6868d84b13a52efe91337f2dccb88e59b9f8d2b7 > Author: Tor Lillqvist > Date: Thu May 17 22:45:04 2012 +0300 > > Add generic --with-build-platform-configure-options > > diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in > index 9c23d

[Libreoffice-commits] .: 2 commits - configure.in README.cross

2012-05-17 Thread Tor Lillqvist
README.cross | 66 +++ configure.in |5 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) New commits: commit bc229ca1abf8b179631ae563ef77f565a1a9d496 Author: Tor Lillqvist Date: Thu May 17 22:57:46 2012 +0300 Update READ