> Hmm, this is about the program called "testtool", not the module> "testtools"
> (note trailing "s"), right? In the latter, at least the> "bridgetest" part is
> certainly useful when porting LO to new> architectures. I remember running
> stuff from there when attempting the> port to 64-bit Wind
Hmm, this is about the program called "testtool", not the module
"testtools" (note trailing "s"), right? In the latter, at least the
"bridgetest" part is certainly useful when porting LO to new
architectures. I remember running stuff from there when attempting the
port to 64-bit Windows, and will s
Hi *,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 12:18 -0500, August Sodora wrote:
>> Is it worth salvaging the tests? Sorry for being so pushy about this
>> topic but I would be super happy to have the basic module contain only
>> language-related functionali
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 12:18 -0500, August Sodora wrote:
> Is it worth salvaging the tests? Sorry for being so pushy about this
> topic but I would be super happy to have the basic module contain only
> language-related functionality :)
Oh - I think the general consensus is that it is almo
