On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 03:37:38PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 03:14:42PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
>
> > a more accurate statement would be, we only use libraries that are in a
> > sufficiently recent version in our baseline system, and which are
> > available in
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 03:14:42PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
> On 15/12/11 19:46, Michael Meeks wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 19:11 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>> On this, someone said on the talk "we use only libc" (and I implicitly
>>> understood: in the binaries we distribute).
>>
On 15/12/11 19:46, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 19:11 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> On this, someone said on the talk "we use only libc" (and I implicitly
>> understood: in the binaries we distribute).
>
> You have to be quite careful with claims from Fridrich, they are
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 19:11 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On this, someone said on the talk "we use only libc" (and I implicitly
> understood: in the binaries we distribute).
You have to be quite careful with claims from Fridrich, they are often
exaggerated for comic effect :-)
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:40:27PM +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> * postgresql bits
> AA: + checking pg baseline on windows (Fridrich)
I had understood this as: "Check Kerberos/GSSAPI on our GNU/Linux
baseline, to see if we can use it as a system library". So nothing on
Windows.
On this, someon
