On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 10:58 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 13:21 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > Hmm, sort of looks like the underlying cppu stuff, or something it uses,
> > got pulled out from under it during the test. I don't think it could
> > have gotten that far for th
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 13:21 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> Hmm, sort of looks like the underlying cppu stuff, or something it uses,
> got pulled out from under it during the test. I don't think it could
> have gotten that far for the uno::sequence dtor (which looks up the type
> of its argument) t
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 11:17 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> Caolan McNamara wrote:
> > > register component 'configmgr.uno.so' in registry
> > > '../../unxlngx6.pro/misc/qa_unit/services.rdb' failed!
> > > error (CannotRegisterImplementationException): loading component library
> > > failed: con
Caolan McNamara wrote:
> > register component 'configmgr.uno.so' in registry
> > '../../unxlngx6.pro/misc/qa_unit/services.rdb' failed!
> > error (CannotRegisterImplementationException): loading component library
> > failed: configmgr.uno.so
>
> Can you (git pull bootstrap) and try export DEBUGR
Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 01:15 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> > I've for the while reverted the commit, will look into this tomorrow.
>
> Ah ! - better to add a prefix to the prj/build.lst dep. or something to
> the makefile.mk so it still build on (only) Linux (?) ;-)
On Wed, 2010-10-27 at 01:15 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
> I've for the while reverted the commit, will look into this tomorrow.
Ah ! - better to add a prefix to the prj/build.lst dep. or something to
the makefile.mk so it still build on (only) Linux (?) ;-) Looking
forward to having it
Caolan McNamara wrote:
> Righteo, re-enabled again and lets have another go. Right away I see it
> detected a new bug introduced with the vos removalstuff, which I've now
> fixed :-). Tests are good.
>
Hi Caolan,
sorry - breaks for me on at least two platforms consistently. Error
log snippet:
rm
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 21:58 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 20:44 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> >
> > So the sc test, while working reliably for me, is apparently not
> > working for Kohei and others
>
> So, I came home and did a clean re-build of the latest source tree on
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 20:44 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
>
> So the sc test, while working reliably for me, is apparently not
> working for Kohei and others
So, I came home and did a clean re-build of the latest source tree on my
reasonably fast desktop machine, and the unit test now runs with
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 11:44 +0200, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
> Caolán McNamara wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 10:54 +0200, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
> >
> >> log per request attached.
> >> I stopped the run after some of these:
> >
> >> ---Type to continue, or q to quit---
> >
> > Bah, you sho
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 10:54 +0200, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
> log per request attached.
> I stopped the run after some of these:
> ---Type to continue, or q to quit---
Bah, you shouldn't have had to type anything here, it should have just
done it all automatically, and it does here.
I've just
Caolan McNamara wrote:
> sc/qa/unit had an existing cppunit test to ensure that calc can do
> =SUM(A1:A2) correctly but it was currently disabled seeing as it didn't
> work, mostly due to miserable bootstrapping problems. I've fixed that
> test (I think), so I hope it can now provide a basis for ad
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 13:37 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> sc/qa/unit had an existing cppunit test to ensure that calc can do
> =SUM(A1:A2) correctly but it was currently disabled seeing as it didn't
> work, mostly due to miserable bootstrapping problems. I've fixed that
> test (I think)
So the s
sc/qa/unit had an existing cppunit test to ensure that calc can do
=SUM(A1:A2) correctly but it was currently disabled seeing as it didn't
work, mostly due to miserable bootstrapping problems. I've fixed that
test (I think), so I hope it can now provide a basis for adding more.
It can be a little
14 matches
Mail list logo
