I'm re-sending this note... I sent it yesterday via gmane, but I guess
this list is configured for moderation even in that situation; so today
I joined.
Mark Wielaard pointed out this note to me.
Feel free to CC 'arc...@sourceware.org' on hacks like this, we're
interested in hearing about them a
> "Michael" == Michael Stahl
> writes:
Mark Wielaard pointed out this note to me.
Feel free to CC 'arc...@sourceware.org' on hacks like this, we're
interested in hearing about them and to find out what developers need
from gdb.
Michael> since my smoketest failed again today, i've dist
Third time's the charm. Apologies if you've seen this a lot.
Mark Wielaard pointed out this note to me.
Feel free to CC 'arc...@sourceware.org' on hacks like this, we're
interested in hearing about them and to find out what developers need
from gdb.
Michael> since my smoketest failed again today
On 18/10/11 12:21, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Monday 17 of October 2011, Michael Stahl wrote:
since my smoketest failed again today, i've distracted myself a bit with
GDB Python scripting, the result of which is a command that can break
when an exception is thrown, but only if a certain function (whi
On Monday 17 of October 2011, Michael Stahl wrote:
> since my smoketest failed again today, i've distracted myself a bit with
> GDB Python scripting, the result of which is a command that can break
> when an exception is thrown, but only if a certain function (which is
> given as parameter) is on t
since my smoketest failed again today, i've distracted myself a bit with
GDB Python scripting, the result of which is a command that can break
when an exception is thrown, but only if a certain function (which is
given as parameter) is on the stack.
seems to work, but it is quite slow: findi
