Re: [Libreoffice] few queastions about building sal

2011-09-01 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 20:49 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Zero. But it does not hurt that much to have them exported, does it? > So I would just play it safe. YMMV. Culturally - I think we prefer to play it dangerously - just on principle :-) Having clean code is huge win vs. a very

Re: [Libreoffice] few queastions about building sal

2011-08-29 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On Aug 29, 2011, at 8:35 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 15:53 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: >> On Aug 29, 2011, at 2:50 PM, Matúš Kukan wrote: >>> rtl_hashfunc, rtl_hashentry_destroy and 5 more rtl_hashtable_* from >>> rtl/source/locale.c >> >> Ah, I see. Yes, indeed, appears

Re: [Libreoffice] few queastions about building sal

2011-08-29 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 15:53 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On Aug 29, 2011, at 2:50 PM, Matúš Kukan wrote: > > rtl_hashfunc, rtl_hashentry_destroy and 5 more rtl_hashtable_* from > > rtl/source/locale.c > > Ah, I see. Yes, indeed, appears they have erroneously been added to > sal.map once, and

Re: [Libreoffice] few queastions about building sal

2011-08-29 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On Aug 29, 2011, at 2:50 PM, Matúš Kukan wrote: > On 29 August 2011 09:48, Stephan Bergmann > wrote: >> On Aug 28, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Matúš Kukan wrote: >>> I was working on gbuildizing sal and few problems showed up: >>> >>> 1, in sal/osl/unx/system.h:75 there is #if GLIBC >= 2 >>>but I coul

Re: [Libreoffice] few queastions about building sal

2011-08-29 Thread Matúš Kukan
On 29 August 2011 09:48, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On Aug 28, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Matúš Kukan wrote: >> I was working on gbuildizing sal and few problems showed up: >> >> 1, in sal/osl/unx/system.h:75 there is #if GLIBC >= 2 >>    but I could not find how is GLIBC defined. In Env.Host.sh I have >>

Re: [Libreoffice] few queastions about building sal

2011-08-29 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 09:48:29AM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On Aug 28, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Matúš Kukan wrote: > > I was working on gbuildizing sal and few problems showed up: > > > > 1, in sal/osl/unx/system.h:75 there is #if GLIBC >= 2 > >but I could not find how is GLIBC defined. In E

Re: [Libreoffice] few queastions about building sal

2011-08-29 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 23:57 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote: > 4. This is not problem for me, but in sal/inc/sal/cppunit.h I have > seen typo: LibreOfficeProtect*e*r. So, it is unused, > and I'm just wondering where and how it should be used ? It is > something new ? Fixed now. I tweaked some existi

Re: [Libreoffice] few queastions about building sal

2011-08-29 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On Aug 28, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Matúš Kukan wrote: > I was working on gbuildizing sal and few problems showed up: > > 1, in sal/osl/unx/system.h:75 there is #if GLIBC >= 2 >but I could not find how is GLIBC defined. In Env.Host.sh I have > GLIBC="2REDHAT60" but that is something else probably. >

[Libreoffice] few queastions about building sal

2011-08-28 Thread Matúš Kukan
Hi, I was working on gbuildizing sal and few problems showed up: 1, in sal/osl/unx/system.h:75 there is #if GLIBC >= 2 but I could not find how is GLIBC defined. In Env.Host.sh I have GLIBC="2REDHAT60" but that is something else probably. (wrong branch in #if .. #else .. is executed for m