On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 10:34 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Oh nice; not something I had noticed. Can we do a big global hunt & fix
> for all these instances ?
cppcheck lists these for us, hmm, at least cppcheck *was* listing them
for us. Until very recently http://libreoffice.boldandbusted.co
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 21:02 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> As Takeshi pointed out in another mail, the postfix form returns a copy
> of the iterator as it was before the increment, while the prefix form
> returns a reference to the current value after its increment. So postfix
> requires an extra
