On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 16:23 -0300, Kayo Hamid wrote:
> From cppcheck: Using .empty() instead of .size() can be faster.
> .size() can take linear time but .empty() is guaranteed to take
> constant time
Many thanks for that other patch. I just pushed it too!
--
Cédric Bosdonnat
From cppcheck: Using .empty() instead of .size() can be faster.
.size() can take linear time but .empty() is guaranteed to take
constant time
Sending for review.
revol_diff --git a/basegfx/source/polygon/b2dpolypolygoncutter.cxx b/basegfx/source/polygon/b2dpolypolygoncutter.cxx