Re: [Libreoffice] compilation and bundled extensions

2011-02-17 Thread David Tardon
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:20:27AM +0100, David Tardon wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 09:26:47PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > caolanm->dtardon: Which reminds me, when i did this I didn't seem to get > > the python, beanshell, rhino scripting extensions (not that I really > > want the beanshe

Re: [Libreoffice] compilation and bundled extensions

2011-02-15 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Le 15/02/2011 10:14, Caolán McNamara a écrit : > On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 08:44 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: >> It seems that bundled extensions have not been build : pdfimport.oxt >> does not exist. Even after having done > Ah, I assumed you'd already *built* them, but wondered why they weren't

Re: [Libreoffice] compilation and bundled extensions

2011-02-15 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 15/02/11 10:14, Caolán McNamara a écrit : Hi, > Ah, I assumed you'd already *built* them, but wondered why they weren't > auto-installed, use --enable-ext-pdfimport, etc. to build them. > > C. > Is there no single switch to build them all in one go ? I was looking through the autogen.sh o

Re: [Libreoffice] compilation and bundled extensions

2011-02-15 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 08:44 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: > It seems that bundled extensions have not been build : pdfimport.oxt > does not exist. Even after having done Ah, I assumed you'd already *built* them, but wondered why they weren't auto-installed, use --enable-ext-pdfimport, etc. to

Re: [Libreoffice] compilation and bundled extensions

2011-02-14 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Le 14/02/2011 10:12, David Tardon a écrit : > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:22:41AM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: >> I did "make dev-install" to try the result. No problem although I wonder >> why this command did not install the bundled extensions. >> Is there some option to add to do a complete

Re: [Libreoffice] compilation and bundled extensions

2011-02-14 Thread David Tardon
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 09:26:47PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote: > caolanm->dtardon: Which reminds me, when i did this I didn't seem to get > the python, beanshell, rhino scripting extensions (not that I really > want the beanshell, rhino ones, but I did want the python one) I probably forgot to a

Re: [Libreoffice] compilation and bundled extensions

2011-02-14 Thread David Tardon
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:22:41AM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: > I did "make dev-install" to try the result. No problem although I wonder > why this command did not install the bundled extensions. > Is there some option to add to do a complete installation ? You can always "install" them by

Re: [Libreoffice] compilation and bundled extensions

2011-02-13 Thread Caolán McNamara
On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 11:22 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote: > I did "make dev-install" to try the result. No problem although I wonder > why this command did not install the bundled extensions. > Is there some option to add to do a complete installation ? I wondered this too earlier today, try

[Libreoffice] compilation and bundled extensions

2011-02-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Hi, I compiled LibO (branch master) on my notebook under Ubuntu 10.04 (x86_64). All worked fine. It took ~ 4 hours with 2 CPUs underclocked to 63% to prevent overheating. I did "make dev-install" to try the result. No problem although I wonder why this command did not install the bundled extensio