Hi Bjoern,
On 2011-05-31 at 14:37 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> > To sum up my proposal:
> >
> > - master
> > - no review, anything can be committed / merged into it
> > - as long as the author did her / his best to make sure it
> > builds / does not break the tests)
> >
> > - l
Hi Kendy,
On Tue, 31 May 2011 10:43:22 +0200
Jan Holesovsky wrote:
> To sum up my proposal:
>
> - master
> - no review, anything can be committed / merged into it
> - as long as the author did her / his best to make sure it
> builds / does not break the tests)
>
> - libreoffice-A-X
Hi Bjorn,
On 2011-05-30 at 19:13 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> > So - as long as you don't force people to do this [ie. don't force
> > this as a rule, but instead let them decide if they are willing to
> > wait for the merge of the branch into the master (working mostly on
> > the branch bef
